2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining research & development process targets through retro-techno-economic analysis: The sugarcane biorefinery case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Macrelli et al , bioethanol production cost can be reduced by resolving technical problems, maximizing the yield and productivity, and optimizing the process design on a larger scale. Table summarizes the MESP or break‐even selling price (BESP) of ethanol from various recent studies on the economic analysis of 1G and 2G‐ethanol production, taking into consideration the use of bagasse in biogas and electricity generation …”
Section: Cellulosic Ethanol Business Model Partnerships and Currentsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Macrelli et al , bioethanol production cost can be reduced by resolving technical problems, maximizing the yield and productivity, and optimizing the process design on a larger scale. Table summarizes the MESP or break‐even selling price (BESP) of ethanol from various recent studies on the economic analysis of 1G and 2G‐ethanol production, taking into consideration the use of bagasse in biogas and electricity generation …”
Section: Cellulosic Ethanol Business Model Partnerships and Currentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Table presents some important examples of companies that are taking a lead in cellulosic ethanol production . A recent analysis by Lux research on a cost economic model for 2G ethanol production by six major companies (Beta Renewables, Poet + DSM, Granbio, Abengoa, Raizen, and Dow‐Dupont), using Arundo donax , corn stover, sugarcane bagasse/straw, corn stover, sugarcane bagasse and corn stover feedstocks respectively and three pretreatment technologies (dilute acid, steam explosion and alkaline), found that feedstock cost can impact nearly 40%, and potentially around 16% of the cost can be reduced by improvements in pretreatment yield, enzyme hydrolysis, and fermentation efficiency . According to Macrelli et al , bioethanol production cost can be reduced by resolving technical problems, maximizing the yield and productivity, and optimizing the process design on a larger scale.…”
Section: Cellulosic Ethanol Business Model Partnerships and Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prolonged pretreatment might result in the formation of pseudo-lignin that could lead to an overestimation of lignin content and affect the accessibility of enzymes during enzymatic hydrolysis (Kumar et al 2013 ). A retro-techno-economic analysis of the pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation process would be able to ascertain the process boundaries for economic feasibility (Longati et al 2018 ) for further research and development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, there are two facilities aiming at producing ethanol from sugarcane bagasse and straw, highly available feedstocks that amount to about 180 million tons of dry biomass per year [2,3]. Nevertheless, this industry still faces several challenges, with economic studies showing that enzyme costs significantly affect the minimum ethanol selling price, resulting in a negative impact in the technology's competitiveness in the biofuels market [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%