2021
DOI: 10.1080/08934215.2021.1974506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Sexual Consent: Perspectives from a College Student Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of wantedness, however, presents an interesting dilemma: does one have to want sexual contact to consent to it? That wantedness is inherent in defining sexual consent may be linked to research that has identified participants’ preoccupation with using some form of intuition to ascertain whether their sexual partner is consenting (Bednarchik et al, 2022; Hirsch et al, 2019; Jozkowski & Peterson, 2013; Marg, 2020). This was further present in how Study 2’s participants discussed sexual consent (albeit, implicitly).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lack of wantedness, however, presents an interesting dilemma: does one have to want sexual contact to consent to it? That wantedness is inherent in defining sexual consent may be linked to research that has identified participants’ preoccupation with using some form of intuition to ascertain whether their sexual partner is consenting (Bednarchik et al, 2022; Hirsch et al, 2019; Jozkowski & Peterson, 2013; Marg, 2020). This was further present in how Study 2’s participants discussed sexual consent (albeit, implicitly).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no further research was conducted on participants’ answers, leaving somewhat of a void between other variables (e.g., RMA, victimization history, gender) that may influence sexual consent definitions. More recently, Bednarchik et al (2022) explored 391 undergraduate students’ sexual consent definitions and thematic analysis generated five themes: permission, agreement, willingness, wantedness, and contextual elements. These findings align with previous literature but also highlight the variety in students’ definitions.…”
Section: Sexual Consent Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual consent is a highly debated and complicated communicative construct with varying definitions (Bednarchik, Generous, & Mongeau, 2022;Beres, 2007). Research is needed to better understand ways of educating young adults about the concept of affirmative sexual consent and increase their intentions to enact this behavior within their future sexual interactions.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have defined sexual consent as: Any agreement to participate in sex (Archard, 1998;Dripps, 1992); the absence of force or coercion (Hickman & Muehlenhard, 1999); and involving internal feelings and external signs of willingness or wanting to have sex (Hickman & Muehlenhard, 1999). Furthermore, Bednarchik et al (2022) defines consent as permission, agreement, and willingness to engage in sexual activity indicated by each participant of sound mind (i.e., sober, and not under the influence). In the present study, sexual consent is defined based on an affirmative approach to sexual consent, which means that consent is an affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity, a process that is continuous, and should happen at all stages of sexual activity.…”
Section: Defining Sexual Consent and Sexual Consent Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicate that young people perceive sexual consent as conscious mutual agreement or willingness to engage in sexual activity without force and coercion (Beare & Boonzaier, 2020; Bednarchik et al, 2022; Brady et al, 2018; Holmström et al, 2020; Jozkowski et al, 2014). Studies further suggest that young people recognize the importance of establishing sexual consent, and perceive the absence of consent as a form of sexual violence (Whittington, 2021; Wignall et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%