2017
DOI: 10.1680/jmapl.15.00056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining social value in the UK construction industry

Abstract: This paper evaluates the rationale behind the UK Public Services (Social Value) Act to postulate a definition of 'social value' and its application to construction and enable authorities to implement it. A comprehensive literature review has been undertaken and publications on existing methods of measurement have been reviewed and discussed to provide a comprehensive summary. The literature review revealed that communities could benefit from a series of direct and indirect impacts on individual people as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in making sense of what is socially valuable for whom and by whom, there is a need to regard the management of stakeholders as both a noun and a verb (Bakken and Hernes, 2006). This paper contributes to growing interest in defining what social value means in practice (Cartigny & Lord 2017;Raidén et al 2019;Daniel & Pasquire 2018;, which includes a wide array of stakeholders beyond the common procurement focus (Cartigny & Lord 2018;Awuzie & McDermott 2016;Loosemore 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion: The Ever-changing Stakeholder And The Difficulties Of Delivering Social Value In Megaprojectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, in making sense of what is socially valuable for whom and by whom, there is a need to regard the management of stakeholders as both a noun and a verb (Bakken and Hernes, 2006). This paper contributes to growing interest in defining what social value means in practice (Cartigny & Lord 2017;Raidén et al 2019;Daniel & Pasquire 2018;, which includes a wide array of stakeholders beyond the common procurement focus (Cartigny & Lord 2018;Awuzie & McDermott 2016;Loosemore 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion: The Ever-changing Stakeholder And The Difficulties Of Delivering Social Value In Megaprojectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While delivering social value along this triple bottom line seems reasonable, defining what this means is less straightforward since there is no accepted definition of what social value means (see Nakamba et al 2017). Furthermore, growing interest in social value in construction (Cartigny & Lord 2017;Raidén et al 2019;Daniel & Pasquire 2018) has often focussed on client perspectives in the procurement of construction projects (Cartigny & Lord 2018;Awuzie & McDermott 2016;Loosemore 2015) with relative less attention paid to a wider range of stakeholders affected by construction. Thus, our case study context of examining the dynamics of stakeholder management in Dounreay, an experimental nuclear facility that is at an advanced stage of decommissioning, is unique; while much research, even on mega construction projects, is on new-built, the context in this study is on nuclear decommissioning and remediation Invernizzi et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key terms highlighted in the literature will be used to determine if there is any evidence of social value being targeted in construction projects. The literature review conducted by Cartigny and Lord (2017) concluded with a list of key terms; see the following summary…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key sources of literature that assisted in defining social value at the individual level were found in sociology journals; refer to the first part of the study by Cartigny and Lord (2017) for further discussion.…”
Section: Social Value In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation