2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the Intensity of Conditioning Regimens: Working Definitions

Abstract: SUMMARY Defining conditioning regimen intensity has become a critical issue for the hemopoietic stem cell transplant community. In the present report we propose to define conditioning regimens in three categories: (a) myeloablative conditioning (MA) , (b) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and (c) non myeloablative conditioning (NMA). Assignment to these categories is based on the duration of cytopenia and on the requirement for stem cell (SC) support: MA regimens cause irreversible cytopenia and SC support … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,056
0
29

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,536 publications
(1,095 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
10
1,056
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore grouped the intensity of conditioning in our study according to expected toxicities and length of aplasia in RIC and NMA. 16,17 In the most published studies the intensity of conditioning was comparable to our regimens. 10,20 In elderly patients MRD are mostly of similar advanced age as the recipient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We therefore grouped the intensity of conditioning in our study according to expected toxicities and length of aplasia in RIC and NMA. 16,17 In the most published studies the intensity of conditioning was comparable to our regimens. 10,20 In elderly patients MRD are mostly of similar advanced age as the recipient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The group difference was statistically significant in survival analysis (p 5 0.030), and was essentially confirmed by a Cox regression analysis controlling for the predefined variables (p 5 0.034). The reduced event rate was further related (p 5 0.046) to one of the predefined control variables, that is, to reduced conditioning regimes (classified according to Bacigalupo et al 33 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To account for potential confounders, analyses of crude log-rank tests were corroborated with Cox regression models accounting for the Cancer Therapy following predefined, potentially confounding variables: (i) EBMT risk score, 5 (ii) Karnofsky Performance Score, 6 (iii) intensity of condition regimes according to Bacigalupo et al, 33 (iv) gender 34 and (v) fitness at baseline. 8 For analyses of competing risks, that is, simultaneous analyses of both NRM and deaths related to a relapse-estimation of cumulative incidence functions was based on the approach described by Fine and Gray.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen included either 8 Gy fractionated Total Body Irradiation or non-fractionated equivalent, or high-dose busulfan (>8 mg/kg orally or intravenous equivalent). Regimen not meeting these criteria was considered to be reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%