2012
DOI: 10.1038/nature11344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the mode of tumour growth by clonal analysis

Abstract: Recent studies using the isolation of a subpopulation of tumour cells followed by their transplantation into immunodeficient mice provide evidence that certain tumours1,2, including squamous skin tumours3-5, contain cells with high clonogenic potential that have been referred to as cancer stem cells (CSCs). Until now, CSC properties have only been investigated by transplantation assays, and their existence in unperturbed tumour growth is unproven. Here we make use of clonal analysis of squamous skin tumours us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
511
2
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 667 publications
(543 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
511
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the role of specific genes in the spontaneous generation of tumours can be examined using transgenic technology, as well as transplantation assays that can use syngeneic recipients of any age. More recently, lineage tracing has been exploited to add further strong evidence of CSCs in glioblastomas, intestinal adenomas and epidermal tumours developing de novo in mice and, in the case of the glioblastoma, their anticipated drug resistance was also demonstrated [61][62][63] . These findings highlight how mouse models of tumorigenesis may facilitate the future development of methods for interrogating CSCs in patient samples for clinical purposes.…”
Section: Csc Assays: Strengths and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the role of specific genes in the spontaneous generation of tumours can be examined using transgenic technology, as well as transplantation assays that can use syngeneic recipients of any age. More recently, lineage tracing has been exploited to add further strong evidence of CSCs in glioblastomas, intestinal adenomas and epidermal tumours developing de novo in mice and, in the case of the glioblastoma, their anticipated drug resistance was also demonstrated [61][62][63] . These findings highlight how mouse models of tumorigenesis may facilitate the future development of methods for interrogating CSCs in patient samples for clinical purposes.…”
Section: Csc Assays: Strengths and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggested that the former subset included the differentiated/progenitor cells, while the later might be stem cells which maintain the tumour growth. Additionally, the growth characteristic of the tumour was reminiscent of the normal skin stratified architecture [57]. Taken together, these three mouse models, employing skillful imaging and lineage tracking studies, proved beyond doubt the existence of CSC and their role in tumour initiation and relapse.…”
Section: Controversy About the Existence Of Cancer Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Schepers et al used the intestinal adenoma (a premalignant precursor lesion; driver mutation is APC null mutation)-prone mouse model and Driessens et al used a benign papilloma mouse model to drive home an important point: tumours are maintained by dedicated cancer stem cells, and tumour growth is analogous to normal tissue renewal and architecture [56,57]. Schepers et al brought a loxP cassette containing four fluorescent labels in the background of adenoma-prone mouse which conditionally express Cre recombinase and in which intestinal stem cells are labelled with GFP.…”
Section: Controversy About the Existence Of Cancer Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, they are referred to as tumor-initiating cells (TICs). The existence of CSC population remains a controversial topic due to questions about the robustness of CSC markers (Magee et al, 2012), however, three independent studies successfully identified and tracked CSCs in brain, skin and intestinal tumors of mice Driessens et al, 2012;Schepers et al, 2012). These findings might provide further evidence to support that CSCs are the driving force of tumor development (Gilbertson and Graham, 2012).…”
Section: Cancer Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 98%