2022
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00319-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the normal range of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in children: one size does not fit all

Abstract: BackgroundThe normal range of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is influenced by demographic factors. However, single, fixed cut-off values are used for clinical interpretation in children despite rapid growth. We aimed to define the normal range of FeNO during childhood and evaluate its utility in the diagnostic setting.MethodFeNO percentile charts were developed using data from non-asthmatic children in a population-based birth cohort (MAAS). Children were skin prick tested and FeNO measured at the age … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While F ENO is usually expressed in parts per billion, attempts have been made to standardise concentrations, similar to percentage predicted or z-score values of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ). One group standardised F ENO for height using data from two UK populations and found that concentrations above the 90th centile (equivalent to 25 ppb in a 10-year-old boy of average height) has 59% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 97% positive predictive value and 50% negative predicted value [ 35 ].…”
Section: Exhaled No To Diagnose Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While F ENO is usually expressed in parts per billion, attempts have been made to standardise concentrations, similar to percentage predicted or z-score values of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ). One group standardised F ENO for height using data from two UK populations and found that concentrations above the 90th centile (equivalent to 25 ppb in a 10-year-old boy of average height) has 59% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 97% positive predictive value and 50% negative predicted value [ 35 ].…”
Section: Exhaled No To Diagnose Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, females have been reported to have approximately 25% lower FeNO values compared to males. 21,22 Further, height, 23,24 age, 24,25 and atopic status 24,26 may all act as confounders. Personalized normal values for FeNO that account for these factors have therefore been proposed 24 ; however, the diagnostic value of such personalized normal values in the context of EIB is yet to be evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%