Defining the primary research question in veterinary clinical studies

Abstract

Veterinary clinical trials are experiments that test medical treatments in client-owned animals with naturally occurring health conditions. As veterinarians become increasingly familiar with the principles of evidence-based medicine, they are looking to the results of clinical trials to guide their practice. However, the methodological quality of published veterinary clinical trials is often poor, 1-4 which means that readers could draw incorrect conclusions from trial results and in turn make unfounded changes in patient care. Results of a recent review of study power in reports of small animal trials indicated that not only did most trials contain methodological flaws, but only a handful of studies even stated the primary research question. 4 Whereas this may seem impossible (after all, how can an experiment have no question?), it is actually a well-recognized problem in clinical research: the general idea is clear, but the specific study question is inadequately defined. 5 In trying to address large knowledge gaps with minimal resources, veterinary investigators often pose a broad research objective, design a study that will maximize the number and types of comparisons that can be made, comb the data to find interesting associations, and then devise explanations as to what these findings mean. Although well intentioned, trials that utilize this exploratory data-driven approach can result in biased or misleading results and are typically improperly designed to answer the questions of greatest clinical relevance. Of particular concern is the potential to arrive at false conclusions because of inappropriate study design, inadequate sample size, multiple statistical comparisons, or a combination of these issues. These are serious problems that affect the validity of clinical trials and other common research designs in veterinary medicine, such as retrospective case series and cohort studies as well as preclinical studies (eg, those involving purpose-bred animals or cadavers).Development of a primary research question is essential to producing clinically relevant study results that can be applied to evidence-based practice. 5-8 A well-defined and specific research question helps determine the appropriate study design, sample population, and methods of data collection and analysis nec- A thoughtful, clearly defined research question should be the foundation of any clinical trial or research study. The research question helps determine key study methods, and defining a specific research question helps avoid problems with inadequate sample size, inappropriate design, or multiple statistical comparisons. Rationales and strategies for formulating research questions and using them to define study protocols are discussed, with a focus on application in clinical trials. ( J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016;249:547-551) essary to meaningfully address the knowledge gaps of greatest importance. 8 In this article, I will review how to define a research question, explain how the research question determines key methodological elements...

Can the quality and clinical relevance of Equine Veterinary Journal publications be improved? A time for reflection and refinement

“…This number increased to a little over 3% of 92 scientific manuscripts published in 2015 suggesting there is plenty of room for increasing the number of hypothesis driven research reports. Providing justification for experimental trials (background), stating hypotheses, stipulating objectives and identifying primary (and secondary) outcomes are preliminary and essential steps in defining the primary research question and designing a research plan and when absent experimental trials fall apart . Trial design, appropriate analytical methods and the number of subjects required to provide meaningful results cannot be determined if these requirements are not known.…”

A Systematic Review of the Quality of IV Fluid Therapy in Veterinary Medicine

“…Defining the primary research question, proper trial design with predefined outcome measures, sample size determination, and appropriately planned statistical approaches are interrelated CONSORT statement items that should be determined prior to study execution ( 17 , 32 – 34 ). Of the 139 manuscripts reviewed in the present study, more than 50% failed to state specific objectives or hypotheses, disclose proper description of trial design, or predefine primary outcome measures (Table 2 ; items 2b, 3a, 6a).…”

Clinical Trials in Veterinary Medicine: A New Era Brings New Challenges

“…Poor RCTs waste valuable resources, complicate future research, provide false hope to owners, and potentially could jeopardize patient safety. One of the easiest ways for investigators to insure good design is to carefully predefine their endpoints and statistical plan, preferably with the input of a biostatistician . The International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE) requires registration of clinical trials in a public trials registry at or before the time of first patient enrollment as a condition of consideration for publication .…”

“…Randomized clinical trials yield important answers, but results from these studies can be difficult to interpret, incomplete, unhelpful, or even misleading unless the study design, execution, reporting, and interpretation are carried out with care. The methodology of well‐designed and reported veterinary RCTs has been the subject of several previous publications . In a very simple sense, the best RCTs foster better everyday clinical decisions made at the patient's side.…”