Trauma. 2009;66:951-953. P roximal humerus fractures are a common injury and rank second only to distal radius fractures in incidence among upper extremity fractures. Although often considered a bimodal disease affecting elderly women and young males, fractures of the proximal humerus occur in all ages and genders and are a significant source of morbidity.Although it is generally accepted that the majority of these fractures are minimally displaced and patients can be expected to return to an acceptable functional level, 1 more complex fractures, such as two-, three-, and four-part fractures with greater tuberosity displacement, have a moreguarded prognosis regardless of treatment. The results of both operative and nonoperative treatment for these complex fractures run the gamut from excellent to poor. 2-13 Furthermore, no single treatment modality has been demonstrated to be clearly superior in optimizing outcome. 2,13 The precise cause of these unpredictable outcomes remains elusive and is likely multifactoral.One factor that may contribute to these unpredictable outcomes is the integrity of the rotator cuff. Historically, because of a lack of distinguishing clinical symptoms and their inability to be visualized on plain radiographs, softtissue structures have been neglected during initial evaluation of periarticular fractures. Only within the past decade have studies assessing adjacent tendons and ligaments been published in the study of these fractures. 14 -16 Rotator cuff tendons face the additional diagnostic problem of not routinely being completely visualized during exposure for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Complete visualization of these tendons often requires more extensive soft-tissue stripping, which can lead to increased stiffness and devascularization of fracture fragments. Therefore, the true incidence of rotator cuff tears in this setting and their impact on patient outcome remain elusive.Several studies have been undertaken to address this problem. In a study using arthroscopy at the time of definitive fixation, authors demonstrated a 50% and 18% incidence of subscapularis and supraspinatus tears, respectively, in the setting of all periarticular shoulder fractures, including those of the proximal humerus, clavicle, and scapula. 17 Three studies used dynamic ultrasonography to assess the status of the rotator cuff tendons in patients after proximal humerus fractures. In one study, authors revealed that 46% of patients had moderate and 20% severe alterations in the rotator cuff tendons after proximal humerus fractures. 18 The other study demonstrated injury to the rotator cuff tendons in nine of 27 patients with minimally displaced proximal humerus fractures. 19 The final study demonstrated a nearly 50% incidence of full-thickness tears in conservatively managed proximal humerus fractures. 20 More recently, a prospective magnetic resonance imaging analysis of proximal humerus fractures was undertaken to determine the integrity of the rotator cuff tendons. In this study, 71% of ...