Definition and origin of the dune-field pattern at White Sands, New Mexico

Day

2017

Sedimentology

Self Cite

Aeolian dune fields evolve from protodunes and small dunes into a pattern of progressively fewer, larger and more widely spaced dunes within limits defined by boundary conditions. However, the allogenic boundary conditions that promote aeolian dune‐field development, accumulation of strata and preservation of accumulated strata are not the same. Autogenic processes, such as dune interactions, scour‐depth variation along migrating dunes and substrate cannibalization by growing dunes, result in removal of the stratigraphic record. Moreover, dune‐field events may be collapsed into major erosional bounding surfaces. The question is what stages of evolving dune fields are represented in the rock record? This case study of ca 60 m of Jurassic Entrada Sandstone on the Utah/Arizona border (USA) defines stratigraphic intervals by gross architecture of bounding surfaces and sets of cross‐strata. The interpreted intervals in stratigraphic order consist of: (i) a lower sabkha bed that transitions upward into erosional remnants of small sets representing an initial wet aeolian system; (ii) large, compound cross‐strata representing a mature dune field; (iii) isolated scour‐fill representing negatively climbing dunes that produced ca 25 m of palaeo‐topographic relief; (iv) downlapping sets that fill the landscape‐scale relief; (v) four intervals of stacked climbing sets that each represent short periods of time; and (vi) an upper sabkha bed that again transitions into small sets representing a wet system. Accumulations appear to be associated with sediment pulses, a rising water table, and filling of scoured troughs and landscape‐scale depressions. Preservation of the accumulations is selective and associated with a rising water table, burial and subsidence. The preserved record appears remarkably incomplete. Speculation about missing strata gravitates towards cannibalization of the record of early dune‐field construction, and strata removed during the formation of bounding surfaces. This local Entrada record is thought to represent a point in the spectrum of preservation styles in the rock record.

h_{SD}^{2} / h_{M}

.…”

Section: Stratigraphic Unitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is preserved in the aeolian rock record? A Jurassic Entrada Sandstone case study at the Utah–Arizona border

Day

2017

Sedimentology

Self Cite

“…White Sands Dune Field in south-central New Mexico. Detailed analysis of dune parameters within the area of the LiDAR surveys is given in Baitis et al (2014). Active playas, the largest being Lake Lucero, occur yet westward in the topographic low of the basin.…”

Section: Study Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Dune deformation in a multi‐directional wind regime: White Sands Dune Field, New Mexico

Pedersen

Earth Surf Processes Landf

Mohrig

et al. 2015

Self Cite

As with most dune fields, the White Sands Dune Field in New Mexico forms in a wind regime that is not unimodal. In this study, crescentic dune shape change (deformation) with migration at White Sands was explored in a time series of five LiDAR‐derived digital elevation models (DEMs) and compared to a record of wind direction and speed during the same period. For the study period of June 2007 to June 2010, 244 sand‐transporting wind events occurred and define a dominant wind mode from the SW and lesser modes from the NNW and SSE. Based upon difference maps and tracing of dune brinklines, overall dune behavior consists of crest‐normal migration to the NE, but also along‐crest migration of dune sinuosity and stoss superimposed dunes to the SE. The SW winds are transverse to dune orientations and cause most forward migration. The NNW winds cause along‐crest migration of dune sinuosity and stoss bedforms, as well as SE migration of NE‐trending dune terminations. The SSE winds cause ephemeral dune deformation, especially crestal slipface reversals. The dunes deform with migration because of differences in dune‐segment size, and differences in the lee‐face deposition rate as a function of the incidence angle between the wind direction and the local brinkline orientation. Each wind event deforms dune shape, this new shape then serves as the boundary condition for the next wind event. Shared incidence‐angle control on dune deformation and lee‐face stratification types allows for an idealized model for White Sands dunes. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

“…The dune field consists of a core of crescentic ridge and barchan dunes, which are bordered by parabolic dunes to the north, east and south. The crescentic dunes average 4·7 m in height (Baitis et al ., ), crestline length averages 247 m, dune spacing averages 136 m and crestline orientation is 345° (Ewing et al ., ), which is borderline transverse (classification of Hunter et al ., ) to the net resultant of the wind towards 065° (Reitz et al ., ; Jerolmack et al ., ). Crescentic dune behaviour consists of crest‐normal migration at ca 3·5 m yr −1 under strongly dominant south‐westerly winds, but there is also along‐crest migration of dune sinuosity to the south‐east because of a secondary mode of NNW winds (Pedersen et al ., ).…”

Section: Study Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Stratigraphic architecture resulting from dune interactions: White Sands Dune Field, New Mexico

Buynevich

2016

Sedimentology

Self Cite

Aeolian dune interactions provide the dynamics for field‐scale pattern emergence and evolution within a set of boundary conditions. Although morphologies for a spectrum of dune interactions are recognized, associated stratigraphic architectures are unknown and have probably been misidentified in the rock record. A unique data set for the White Sands Dune Field in New Mexico (USA) allowed for a detailed analysis in which the morphological evolution of defect and bedform repulsion interactions is chronicled over a decadal time‐series of images and coupled with the resulting stratigraphic architecture, documented from cross‐strata exposed in interdune areas and ground‐penetrating radar imaging of dune interiors. Defect and bedform repulsions represent a class of interactions in which the faster‐migrating dune termination or defect (defect repulsion), or pair of defects (bedform repulsion), collides with the target dune downwind. Results document that during the collision, the defect(s) of the impactor dune recombine(s) with a segment of the target dune, and the redundant target dune segment is ejected as a parabolic‐shaped ejecta dune. The ejecta dune assumes a more barchanoid shape as it migrates downwind. The interaction architecture consists of lateral truncation of the target set by an interaction bounding surface. Defect cross‐strata tangentially approach the surface in plan‐view, and downlap onto the surface in cross‐section. The orientation of the defect cross‐strata is at an acute angle to the trend of the interaction surface. Orientations of the defect cross‐strata, which represent the defect approach angle, and the target dune cross‐strata, which represent the general dune migration direction, diverge at a high angle. Defect cross‐strata typically consist of wind‐ripple laminae, in contrast to the target set that may house grainflow cross‐strata. In the transport direction, the erosional interaction surface curves to become subparallel to subjacent and superjacent cross‐strata where the defect and target unify into a single lee face.