2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2352(99)00036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definitions of a gang and impacts on public policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Petersen (2000), participants were asked how they defined themselves. In contrast to societal depictions, participant narratives stressed their humanity and reflected membership within a cohesive group, founded upon whānau structures, albeit metaphorical or biologically defined whānau membership.…”
Section: Whānau Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Petersen (2000), participants were asked how they defined themselves. In contrast to societal depictions, participant narratives stressed their humanity and reflected membership within a cohesive group, founded upon whānau structures, albeit metaphorical or biologically defined whānau membership.…”
Section: Whānau Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple self‐report of “being in a gang” is insufficient to understand the level of an adolescents’ involvement or the nature of the group with which they are involved. Individuals claiming to be in a gang display marked diversity in their definition of a “gang” (Petersen, ). Bjerregaard () found that a simple follow‐up question to self‐proclaimed gang members (whether theirs was an organized gang or just a bunch of people) created subgroups that differed significantly in descriptions of their gangs' and their own behavior.…”
Section: Next Steps For Gang Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No consensus exits on a universal definition of a gang or agreement among gang researchers of a true definition of a gang (Bjerregaard, 2002;Campbell, 1984;Curry & Spergel, 1988;Decker & VanWinkle, 1996;Esbensen, Winfree, He, & Taylor, 2001;Horowitz, 1990;Klein, 1995;Moore, 1991;Petersen, 2000a;Spergel, 1995). Likewise, identifying gang membership has proven even more problematic among young women as their involvement often differs from their male counterparts.…”
Section: Female Gang Members and Gang Affiliatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even with an apparent increase in female gang activity and the nature of delinquency occurring within the gang milieu, females and gangs have received little programmatic attention (Moore & Hagedorn, 2001); although, recent years have witnessed a renewed interest in research relating to this topic (Cepeda & Valdez, 2003;Esbensen, Deschenes et al, 1999;Laidler & Hunt, 2001;J. Miller, 2001;Petersen, 2000aPetersen, , 2000bPetersen, , 2003Petersen & Valdez, 2002;Peterson et al, 2001;Zatz & Portillos, 2000). Understanding and identifying issues relating to gangs, violence, and victimization is crucial for developing and implementing effective policies and programs that encompass both public health and criminal justice approaches specific to this growing population of young people (Petersen & Valdez, 2004).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%