In his 1944 article, Prospect of a World Without Racial Conflict, W.E.B. DuBois hypothesized that we would never live in a world without racial division. With this in mind, we highlight how neoliberal ideologies promote policy, actions, and an idea of peace that upholds racial inequality in the United States. We consider how neoliberal tenets, such as free market trust and individual responsibility, reflect and promote misperceptions of racial conflict and impact colorblind perceptions of peace and justice. These perceptions promote definitions of conflict as physical violence versus systemic violence, ignore racial equality as a path to peace in favor of harmonious interaction, and highlight individuals as responsible for racial conflict as opposed to the system. In response, we argue for counter-definitions of peace that explicitly acknowledge systemic violence and prioritize justice within the racial conflict context.In his 1944 article, Prospect of a World Without Racial Conflict, W.E.B. Du Bois expressed his belief that we would never live in a world without racial division. He argued that after World War II, racial conflict would persist because victorious nations would move to institute democracy and promote peace, but neglect discussions of race and how these classifications dictate social standing within a hierarchical system of oppression. Contemporary detractors might argue that Du Bois's pessimism was unfounded, suggesting that racial minorities face fewer physical threats than they had in the past. They might suggest that crimes, such as lynching, have dramatically decreased since the years of Reconstruction and the beatings, firehoses, and dogs unleashed on Black protestors during the Civil Rights movement are actions relegated to the past. They might point to the