1988
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800751224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definitive one-stage emergency large bowel surgery

Abstract: During a 30-month period, 126 operations for emergency large bowel conditions were performed: 57 were for colonic carcinoma, 26 for acute diverticulitis, 14 for colonic ischaemia, 13 for complications of inflammatory bowel disease, and 16 for other conditions. Sixty-eight patients had peritonitis. One hundred and ten patients (87.3 per cent) underwent immediate resection. Of these, 83 (65.9 per cent of the overall group) had colonic resection with primary anastomosis but without a colostomy, 56 of which were l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
7

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This is important because there is now mounting evidence to show a more positive outcome, especially regarding postoperative quality of life, and no increase in mortality associated with primary anastomosis over Hartmann's procedure. [2][3][4][5] This is the first study in recent times to look at the outcomes of all emergency colorectal surgery as performed at a district general hospital (DGH). Other studies have shown similar results between consultants and HSTs in a wide range of surgical practice (inguinal hernia surgery, and elective colorectal cancer surgery 12 ), but most of these studies have involved intense consultant supervision or have not looked at the implications of supervision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because there is now mounting evidence to show a more positive outcome, especially regarding postoperative quality of life, and no increase in mortality associated with primary anastomosis over Hartmann's procedure. [2][3][4][5] This is the first study in recent times to look at the outcomes of all emergency colorectal surgery as performed at a district general hospital (DGH). Other studies have shown similar results between consultants and HSTs in a wide range of surgical practice (inguinal hernia surgery, and elective colorectal cancer surgery 12 ), but most of these studies have involved intense consultant supervision or have not looked at the implications of supervision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtotal colectomy plus ileorectal anastomosis has been proven a reasonable option as well [1, 5]. In addition, segmental resection of the obstructed area followed by a primary anastomosis – without a preliminary intra-operative colonic lavage – has been performed successfully [13, 19, 20]. Has this paradigm shift in the management of colonic obstruction – away from the ‘mandatory’ colostomy towards a single-stage procedure – been translated into US practice or is it only a literature-based phenomenon?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversion of the fecal stream by construction of a stoma is still a common procedure in colorectal surgery, despite a trend to avoid stomas, especially in emergency surgery [1, 2]. The construction of a stoma is associated with decreased physical and psychological well-being and decreased quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%