2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deflating asset price bubbles with leverage constraints and monetary policy

Abstract: This paper studies the interaction of labor, goods, and asset markets in experimental macroeconomies populated by household investors. We analyze the aggregate effects of two different policies intended to stabilize asset prices: leverage constraints and a 'leaning against the wind' monetary policy that raises interest rates in response to asset price inflation. We find that introducing a leverage constraint significantly reduces asset prices when the constraint actually binds. Households often circumvent thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wan [49], last, concludes that a mixture of heterogeneous beliefs, market frictions and speculative trading motives can be accountable for bubbles. Fenig et al [50] propose that leverage constraints do not only not prevent asset price bubbles but also drive prices higher. This is why participants supply more labor to obtain a wealth buffer stock.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wan [49], last, concludes that a mixture of heterogeneous beliefs, market frictions and speculative trading motives can be accountable for bubbles. Fenig et al [50] propose that leverage constraints do not only not prevent asset price bubbles but also drive prices higher. This is why participants supply more labor to obtain a wealth buffer stock.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedding an asset market in a general equilibrium framework to experimentally study the effects of monetary policy on bubbles in a more realistic setting is an important topic for future work. One suggestion would be to implement the production economy of Fenig, Mileva, and Petersen (2018) as a learning-to-forecast experiment, where subjects submit expectations but other decisions are optimized by the computer. This would bridge the gap between our study and the study of Fenig, Mileva, and Petersen by making it possible to focus on the role of expectations in a general equilibrium setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we consider three scenarios with different information about the policy, and a scenario in which the central bank uses a proxy for the steady-state fundamental price. Fenig, Mileva, and Petersen (2018) combine a production economy with an asset market. Participants submit labor supply, output demand, and asset trading decisions.…”
Section: Related Theoretical and Experimental Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Guo and Li [47], we employed the gap between the growth rate of M2 and that of GDP to obtain the excess liquidity of M2. Recent studies from Fenig et al [48], Bao and Zong [49], Bolt et al [50], and Galí et al [51] all use the agent-based model to explain the influence of monetary policy on the asset price bubble.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework For Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%