2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deflection and cracking behavior of SFRSCC beams reinforced with hybrid prestressed GFRP and steel reinforcements

Abstract: In the present work, the deflection and cracking behavior of I-shaped cross-sectional beams of Steel Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete (SFRSCC) reinforced in flexure with hybrid prestressed steel strand and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars was investigated. Combining prestressed GFRP bars of relatively low elasticity modulus, but immune to corrosion (located with a small concrete cover), with prestressed steel strand (with higher concrete cover to avoid corrosion), a good balance in terms of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the promising strategies is combining FRP and steel bars for the flexural reinforcement, by applying the FRP bars with the highest internal arm, i.e., with the minimum concrete cover thickness as possible, in order to take advantage of the relatively high tensile capacity of this reinforcement and its immunity to corrosion. For guaranteeing the required level of ductility, as well as the necessary safety in case of a fire, steel bars are also used with a sufficient concrete cover [22][23][24]. Such reinforcement layout also ensures protection from corrosion of the steel bars since the outer layer of the FRP reinforcement offers resistance to the development of macro cracks by promoting the formation of multiple secondary cracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the promising strategies is combining FRP and steel bars for the flexural reinforcement, by applying the FRP bars with the highest internal arm, i.e., with the minimum concrete cover thickness as possible, in order to take advantage of the relatively high tensile capacity of this reinforcement and its immunity to corrosion. For guaranteeing the required level of ductility, as well as the necessary safety in case of a fire, steel bars are also used with a sufficient concrete cover [22][23][24]. Such reinforcement layout also ensures protection from corrosion of the steel bars since the outer layer of the FRP reinforcement offers resistance to the development of macro cracks by promoting the formation of multiple secondary cracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations were performed to obtain the post-cracking constitutive laws of the developed RSFRC, derived from the inverse analysis by fitting the experimental results obtained in 3PNBBT and RPT-3ps, which knowledge may contribute to future design guidelines and design tools for RSFRC structures under aggressive chloride exposure conditions. The fracture parameters define the constitutive law that governs the fracture propagation of the RSFRC when using a FEM-based model [ 38 ], a cross-sectional approach [ 39 ], or any formulation capable to simulate the contribution of the post-cracking tensile capacity of a cement-based material for the verifications at the serviceability and at ultimate limit state conditions [ 20 ].…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the fiber reinforcement is very effective, but it is only representative of a real FRC structure if the fiber distribution in the governing failure section of the structure can be represented by the one observed in the three-point notched beam bending test. FRC beams of relatively small cross-section width pertain to this class of structures [ 20 ]. In the case of slabs or shells, the fiber distribution is almost orthotropic, with the tendency of the fibers to be parallel to the middle plane of this type of structure, but in the plane, the fiber orientation is random [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More frequent use of fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) bars for the flexural reinforcement of concrete elements due to their corrosion immunity, high strength‐to‐weight ratio, good fatigue behavior and non‐magnetic nature and smaller elasticity modulus than of steel bars, which together the smaller bond performance, place extra challenges in terms of accomplishing the performance requisites for serviceability limit state conditions, mainly in the crack width and deflection. The modulus of elasticity of FRP reinforcement varies between 32 GPa and 148 GPa, depending on the type of fibers: glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP)—32/52 GPa, carbon fiber reinforced polymer 105/148 GPa (CFRP), and aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP)—47/81 GPa).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%