1997
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/56/2/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defocusing gravitational microlensing

Abstract: We introduce the notion of defocusing gravitational lens considering a MA-CHO located behind a light source with respect to an observer. The consequence of defocusing effect is a temporal variability of star luminosity which produces a gap instead of a peak as tell-tale signature in the light curve. General theory of (de)focusing rays (geodesics) in a gravitational field is presented. Furthermore, we give estimations of the mass of the lens and the optical depth connected to such a phenomenon. PACS: 95.30 Sf

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 A somehow related idea has been proposed by Capozziello et al (1997) who considered the effect of defocusing gravitational lensing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A somehow related idea has been proposed by Capozziello et al (1997) who considered the effect of defocusing gravitational lensing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… This constant K can be determined. At the point of closest approach to the mass (call this point r = r 0 ), the radius is at a minimum, that is d r /dφ= 0, so it follows that Thus, the path is defined by It can be easily seen that substituting u = 1/ r followed by differentiation gives the well‐known second‐order equation as (Capozziello et al 1997) …”
Section: Light Paths In a Schwarzschild Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be easily seen that substituting u = 1/r followed by differentiation gives the well known second order equation as (Capozziello et al (1997))…”
Section: Kinematical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have: (58) which reproduces, as expected, the scalar-tensor case (42). In other words, scalartensor theories can be recovered in a first order approximation of a general theory where gravity and non-minimal couplings are any (compare (57) with (46)). This fact agrees with the above considerations where Lagrangians of physical interactions are stochastic functions with local gauge invariance properties [12].…”
Section: The General Casementioning
confidence: 99%