2019
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32620-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deforestation and Brazil's Indigenous population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in addition to the Indigenous socialization outside their lands, especially in the Southeast region, they have contact with health professionals and other individuals as loggers, miners, and squatters, who often trespass on the Indigenous lands and have taken advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic to optimize their profiteering in areas previously preserved and destined to Indigenous people by law. Despite the social struggles to minimize the devastation of the forest and reduce the proliferation of infectious diseases [ 12 , 13 ], the current Brazilian political scenario did not create a protective environment and deforestation has increased exponentially [ 14 ]. As described by Ferrante and Fearnside (2020), the Indigenous community should be considered as a risk group, especially if considering the impact that other pandemics have had on this population, forcing the governmental actions as to highlight the isolation and protectionism position [ 15 ].…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in addition to the Indigenous socialization outside their lands, especially in the Southeast region, they have contact with health professionals and other individuals as loggers, miners, and squatters, who often trespass on the Indigenous lands and have taken advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic to optimize their profiteering in areas previously preserved and destined to Indigenous people by law. Despite the social struggles to minimize the devastation of the forest and reduce the proliferation of infectious diseases [ 12 , 13 ], the current Brazilian political scenario did not create a protective environment and deforestation has increased exponentially [ 14 ]. As described by Ferrante and Fearnside (2020), the Indigenous community should be considered as a risk group, especially if considering the impact that other pandemics have had on this population, forcing the governmental actions as to highlight the isolation and protectionism position [ 15 ].…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent editorial published in The Lancet journal, "Bolsonaro's presidency represents the most serious threat to Brazil's Indigenous population since the 1988 Constitution granted Indigenous people the right to exclusive use of their land" (The Lancet 2019). For anthropologists Carino andDiniz (2019, 2241),…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their proximity with other ethnic groups was one of the factors that favored the spread of the SARS-CoV-2, and the first case of infection was associated to the contact with an infected medical doctor [5]. At the same time, wood exploration, deforestation of environmental preservation areas, and illegal mining increased the risk of these native people to be infected with the SARS-CoV-2 and to get other infectious diseases [5][6][7]. Also, despite the Indigenous peoples having constitutional rights, in practice they are not applicable, contrariwise, they are often violated by the Brazilian government through the adoption of antienvironmental measures that resulted in the highest rates of burning in the Amazon forest in the last 20 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%