Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75759-7_63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformable 2D-3D Registration of the Pelvis with a Limited Field of View, Using Shape Statistics

Abstract: Abstract. Our paper summarizes experiments for measuring the accuracy of deformable 2D-3D registration between sets of simulated x-ray images (DRR's) and a statistical shape model of the pelvis bones, which includes x-ray attenuation information ("density"). In many surgical scenarios, the images contain a truncated view of the pelvis anatomy. Our work specifically addresses this problem by examining different selections of truncated views as target images. Our atlas is derived by applying principal component … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6,16,24,25,32,45,60,62,63 Except the method presented by Sadowsky et al, 45 and the method presented by Mahfouz et al, 32 which depend on a deformable 2D/3D registration between the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of a SSM and the X-ray images, all other methods have their reliance on feature-based statistical instantiation from a Point Distribution Model (PDM) in common. 5,6,16,24,25,60,62,63 Common to all these previous works on reconstructing a patient-specific 3D model from X-ray images are: (a) at least two images are used 5,6,16,18,21,24,25,27,29,32,[36][37][38]43,45,60,62,63 ; and/or (b) all images are calibrated. 5,6,16,18,21,24,25,27,29,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,6,16,24,25,32,45,60,62,63 Except the method presented by Sadowsky et al, 45 and the method presented by Mahfouz et al, 32 which depend on a deformable 2D/3D registration between the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of a SSM and the X-ray images, all other methods have their reliance on feature-based statistical instantiation from a Point Distribution Model (PDM) in common. 5,6,16,24,25,60,62,63 Common to all these previous works on reconstructing a patient-specific 3D model from X-ray images are: (a) at least two images are used 5,6,16,18,21,24,25,27,29,32,[36][37][38]43,45,60,62,63 ; and/or (b) all images are calibrated. 5,6,16,18,21,24,25,27,29,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A priori information is often required to handle this otherwise ill-posed problem. Previously, krigingbased methods, 18,21,27,29,[36][37][38]40,43 as well as statistical shape model (SSM) based methods, 5,6,16,24,25,32,45 have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tetrahedral mesh density model was used for representing both shape and density distributions [31], and PCA was simultaneously applied to both of them to construct statistical shape and density model (SSDM) [32]. In the latest work, the femur in which bone cement was injected was tomographically reconstructed from incomplete projection datasets by using SSDM [33], [34].…”
Section: D X-ray Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to enhance the speed of generating the DRR, a tetrahedral mesh representation of the target anatomy was used, (described in detail in our prior publication [8][9][10]). Then, the mutual information between the DRRs and fluoroscope images was optimized to yield the maximum mutual information using a downhill simplex algorithm.…”
Section: Intraoperative Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%