2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation and thermal histories of ordinary chondrites: Evidence for post-deformation annealing and syn-metamorphic shock

Abstract: We show that olivine microstructures in seven metamorphosed ordinary chondrites of different groups studied with optical and transmission electron microscopy can be used to evaluate the post-deformation cooling setting of the meteorites, and to discriminate between collisions affecting cold and warm parent bodies. The L6 chondrites Park (shock stage S1), Bruderheim (S4), Leedey (S4), and Morrow County (S5) were affected by variable shock deformation followed by relatively rapid cooling, and probably cooled as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
7
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While undulatory extinction is rarely observed at pressures >10 GPa in these experiments, other evidence of deformation exists, such as planar fractures, mosaicism, and bent planar deformation features (Schmitt 2000). These are also absent in MG; however, it has been argued that these features can be removed by subsequent annealing of the shocked material (Rubin 2004), particularly if these impacts occurred while the parent body was still hot (≥800-1000°C) (Ruzicka et al 2015).…”
Section: Absence Of Evidence For Shock Heatingmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While undulatory extinction is rarely observed at pressures >10 GPa in these experiments, other evidence of deformation exists, such as planar fractures, mosaicism, and bent planar deformation features (Schmitt 2000). These are also absent in MG; however, it has been argued that these features can be removed by subsequent annealing of the shocked material (Rubin 2004), particularly if these impacts occurred while the parent body was still hot (≥800-1000°C) (Ruzicka et al 2015).…”
Section: Absence Of Evidence For Shock Heatingmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These are also absent in MG; however, it has been argued that these features can be removed by subsequent annealing of the shocked material (Rubin ), particularly if these impacts occurred while the parent body was still hot (≥800–1000 °C) (Ruzicka et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms are, in most cases, recorded in petrofabric (e.g., distribution of minerals), textural relationships of minerals (e.g., grain size distribution), and nanostructure (e.g., intracrystalline deformations). In the specific case of meteorites, the static metamorphism during accretion and impact-related processes operate under extremely different conditions; therefore, the mechanisms are usually well recorded in the highly contrasting textural relationships (e.g., Tomkins 2009;Tait et al 2014;Guignard and Toplis 2015;Krzesi nska 2017), fabric intensities (e.g., Gattacceca et al 2005;Friedrich 2008;Krzesi nska et al 2015;Forman et al 2017;Krzesinska and Almeida 2019), or micro-and nanostructural details of minerals (e.g., Hanna et al 2015;Ruzicka et al 2015;Ruzicka and Hugo 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Ruzicka et al. ; Tomioka and Miyahara ; Ruzicka and Hugo ), and computational simulations (e.g., Baer and Trott ) have addressed the effects of shock exposure. The most common macroscopic and microscopic manifestations of shock wave exposure in meteorites are deformational, transformational, or a combination of both (Sharp and DeCarli ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observable effects of such shock exposure are numerous and varied, depending not only on collisional parameters but also on the nature and composition of the target rock, the in situ surroundings and depth of the ejected meteorite, and the distinguishing behavior of constituent phases in reaction to shock wave subjection. Many studies, based on experimental results (St€ offler et al [1991] and references therein), natural observations (Chen et al 1996;Sharp 1997;Langenhorst and Greshake 1999;Langenhorst and Poirier 2000;Xie et al 2006;Zhang et al 2006;Bl€ aß et al 2010;Acosta-Maeda et al 2013;Ruzicka et al 2015;Tomioka and Miyahara 2017;Ruzicka and Hugo 2018), and computational simulations (e.g., Baer and Trott 2002) have addressed the effects of shock exposure. The most common macroscopic and microscopic manifestations of shock wave exposure in meteorites are deformational, transformational, or a combination of both .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%