2007
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.29-30.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation Behaviour of Composites Reinforced with Four Different Linen Flax Yarn Structures

Abstract: Four types of yarns were made from flax sliver (Linum usitatissimum) as reinforcements in composites: (1) twist-less, (2) two-fold, (3) high-twist singles and (4) medium-twist singles yarns. Flexural, compressive and tensile properties of the epoxy composites were compared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the causes of the nonlinear stress–strain response of the PFCs (and the resulting stiffness reduction at low strains) are not yet clear [32, 48], they are possibly a result of “nonreversible reorientation” on two length scales: (i) untwisting/stretching of the reinforcing twisted staple fiber yarns [32, 39, 49], and (ii) rigid body rotation, stretching and aligning of the cellulose microfibrils in a single plant fiber [12, 32, 46, 48]. The latter is believed to have a dominant role; particularly as plant single fibers themselves have a non‐linear stress‐strain response to tensile loading.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the causes of the nonlinear stress–strain response of the PFCs (and the resulting stiffness reduction at low strains) are not yet clear [32, 48], they are possibly a result of “nonreversible reorientation” on two length scales: (i) untwisting/stretching of the reinforcing twisted staple fiber yarns [32, 39, 49], and (ii) rigid body rotation, stretching and aligning of the cellulose microfibrils in a single plant fiber [12, 32, 46, 48]. The latter is believed to have a dominant role; particularly as plant single fibers themselves have a non‐linear stress‐strain response to tensile loading.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the yarn structure, it could be shown that composites reinforced with twistless or low twisted yarns resulted in higher stiffness and strength performance than those with a higher twist rate. [5][6][7] In addition, a high level of twist decreases the permeability of the yarns. In particular, for textiles with twisted fibre yarns, which need to be impregnated with thermoset binder matrix, an optimum level of twist needs to be found to ensure high yarn permeability but still allow the fibre to be used in processes, such as knitting and weaving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher moulding pressures result in fibre damage and a decrease in mechanical properties. Regarding the yarn structure, it could be shown that composites reinforced with twistless or low twisted yarns resulted in higher stiffness and strength performance than those with a higher twist rate 57. In addition, a high level of twist decreases the permeability of the yarns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%