2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02428991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation measurement by phase-shifting digital holography

Abstract: We measured the surface flatness of both sides for refractive media using the transmitted digital holography method. To enhance the accuracy of the result, phase-shifting system was used. With two different phase modulation of reference beam, the phase profile of object can be easily obtained. Thus, we proposed the surface measurement method which can measure large area fast, compared with conventional methods. To guarantee the reliability of obtained result, we compared with Zygo measurement system. With the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there is speckle noise, among the phase-differences obtained from each divided hologram, the phase-difference with higher intensity at a reconstructed point is more reliable. Therefore, in our previous papers, the phase-difference was obtained by selecting the phase-difference with the maximum intensity at the same point (Morimoto et al 2004(Morimoto et al , 2005a, or the phasedifference at the same point was obtained by averaging the phase-differences obtained from all the divided holograms by considering the weight of the intensity (Morimoto et al 2005b(Morimoto et al , 2005c(Morimoto et al , 2007. It provided the displacement distribution with high-resolution.…”
Section: Windowed Hologrammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If there is speckle noise, among the phase-differences obtained from each divided hologram, the phase-difference with higher intensity at a reconstructed point is more reliable. Therefore, in our previous papers, the phase-difference was obtained by selecting the phase-difference with the maximum intensity at the same point (Morimoto et al 2004(Morimoto et al , 2005a, or the phasedifference at the same point was obtained by averaging the phase-differences obtained from all the divided holograms by considering the weight of the intensity (Morimoto et al 2005b(Morimoto et al , 2005c(Morimoto et al , 2007. It provided the displacement distribution with high-resolution.…”
Section: Windowed Hologrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is speckle noise, the phase-difference with higher intensity at a reconstructed point is more reliable than that with lower intensity. Therefore, the phase-difference at each point is selected when the intensity is the largest at the same point (Morimoto et al 2004(Morimoto et al , 2005a, or the phasedifference is calculated by averaging the phase-differences obtained from all the windowed holograms by considering the weight of the intensity (Morimoto et al 2005b(Morimoto et al , 2005c(Morimoto et al , 2007. In this study, in order to check the effect of the number n of the windowed holograms on accuracy, the number n is changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, holograms and reconstructed images have speckle noise and they provide large errors in the calculation of displacement analysis. In order to decrease the effect of speckle noise, we previously proposed a new method using windowed holograms [12][13][14]. In the method, a very accurate displacement distribution with a small standard deviation of error is obtained from the average phase-difference considering the weight proportional to the intensity i.e., the square of the amplitude of the speckle at each point on the reconstructed object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors proposed a novel method, i.e. the windowed phase‐shifting digital holographic interferometry (PSDHI) [11–14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%