2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-016-2254-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation Mechanism and Microstructure Evolution of T92/S30432 Dissimilar Welded Joint During Creep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HR3C-weld's maximum principal stress distribution trend is basically the same as T92-weld's, but the working time near the surface weld maximum principal stress does not appear to fluctuate in value, which is the reason for the stronger creep resistance [10][11] .…”
Section: Maximum Principal Stress Simulation Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…HR3C-weld's maximum principal stress distribution trend is basically the same as T92-weld's, but the working time near the surface weld maximum principal stress does not appear to fluctuate in value, which is the reason for the stronger creep resistance [10][11] .…”
Section: Maximum Principal Stress Simulation Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As shown in Figure 4, the HAZ and BM hardness decreased considerably after PWHT at 788 • C as a result of sufficient tempering at high temperature (much higher than tempering temperature of the BM). Therefore, PWHT at 788 • C decreases the creep strength of 10% Cr steel, and the fracture mechanism of the ductile failure controlled by plastic deformation is expected to be applied as same as that creep failure under higher applied stress [15,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Creep and Rupture Behavior For Various Pwht Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the most critical zone of the weldment after thermal aging is the interfacial region T92 BM/Ni WM [14]. There are many studies on the creep behavior of martensitic/austenitic dissimilar weld joints between T92 steel and austenitic heat resistant steels (e.g., AISI 304 or 347 grades) [7,[54][55][56]. It has been frequently observed that the final fracture location after creep exposure was located mainly at the T92 weld part within its fine grained heat-affected zone [7,[54][55][56].…”
Section: Fracture Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies on the creep behavior of martensitic/austenitic dissimilar weld joints between T92 steel and austenitic heat resistant steels (e.g., AISI 304 or 347 grades) [7,[54][55][56]. It has been frequently observed that the final fracture location after creep exposure was located mainly at the T92 weld part within its fine grained heat-affected zone [7,[54][55][56]. As it was observed by Falat et al [11][12][13], the quenching-and-tempering post weld treatment (QT PWHT) of the investigated T92/TP316H dissimilar weldments led to microstructural homogenization of welded base materials.…”
Section: Fracture Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%