1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00865601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation of human abdominal aorta at biaxial tensioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 35 ] Thus, comparing a single aorta wall with a double‐walled vas deferens renders a similar thickness of the structures. [ 18,35 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 35 ] Thus, comparing a single aorta wall with a double‐walled vas deferens renders a similar thickness of the structures. [ 18,35 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of tensile aortae stresses for VD compression stress suffers the following problems: –compressive stress is assumed isotropic through different tensile moduli for axial and radial tensions are reported [ 18 ] –we neglect the differences in histology of human abdominal aortae and VD –stress–strain curves are exponential for aortae (Figure 1) –calculation of the compressive modulus from the tensile modulus is only valid within the linear response of materials: E = 3K(1−2ν), where E is the tensile modulus, K the compressive one and ν the Poisson ratio –assuming incompressibility, the bulk modulus is infinite –the Poisson ratio was assumed 0.5, [ 36 ] though it is usually undetermined for human aortae, as VD …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation