2012
DOI: 10.1142/s1793525312500185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation of Singularities and the Homology of Intersection Spaces

Abstract: Abstract. While intersection cohomology is stable under small resolutions, both ordinary and intersection cohomology are unstable under smooth deformation of singularities. For complex projective algebraic hypersurfaces with an isolated singularity, we show that the first author's cohomology of intersection spaces is stable under smooth deformations in all degrees except possibly the middle, and in the middle degree precisely when the monodromy action on the cohomology of the Milnor fiber is trivial. In many s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A natural question is: does a duality-satisfying homology-type theory exist that behaves well under smooth deformations? This question has been broached and, for hypersurfaces with isolated singularities, answered partially in the affirmative in [6] and [7], in which an alternate theory is utilized: the intersection space homology theory introduced in [2]. At this point, a universal generalization has not been discovered, because intersection space theory has not been defined for the vast majority of singular spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A natural question is: does a duality-satisfying homology-type theory exist that behaves well under smooth deformations? This question has been broached and, for hypersurfaces with isolated singularities, answered partially in the affirmative in [6] and [7], in which an alternate theory is utilized: the intersection space homology theory introduced in [2]. At this point, a universal generalization has not been discovered, because intersection space theory has not been defined for the vast majority of singular spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special cases where the stratification of X is more elaborate have been studied, for example in [4], but no all-encompassing picture has been painted. Despite the limited collection of spaces for which it is defined, intersection space theory has had applications in multiple fields: fiber bundle theory [3], algebraic geometry and smooth deformations [6] and [7], perverse sheaves [8], and theoretical physics [2,Chapter 3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now the calculations of [Ban10, Section 3.9], together with our de Rham theorem, show that rk HI 2 (V ) = 1, rk HI 3 (V ) = 204, rk HI 4 (V ) = 1, in perfect agreement with the Betti numbers of V s , s = 0. Indeed, jointly with L. Maxim, we have established the following Stability Theorem, see [BM11]: Let V be a complex n-dimensional projective hypersurface with one isolated singularity and let V s be a nearby smooth deformation of V . Then for all i < 2n, and i = n, HI i s (V ; Q) ≅H i (V s ; Q).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least if H n−1 (L; Z) is torsionfree, where L is the link of the singularity, the isomorphism is induced by a continuous map IV → V s and is thus a ring isomorphism. We use this in [BM11] to endow HI • s (V ; Q) with a mixed Hodge structure so that the canonical map IV → V induces homomorphisms of mixed Hodge structures in cohomology. Even if the monodromy is not trivial, IV → V s induces a monomorphism on homology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point of view was exploited in [3], where the first and third authors considered the case of a hypersurface X ⊂ CP n+1 with only isolated singularities. For simplicity, let us assume that X has only one isolated singular point x, with Milnor fiber F x and local monodromy operator T x : H n (F x ) → H n (F x ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%