2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs

Abstract: The small differences of strain between the modular necks tested in this study are not expected to influence bone remodeling in the proximal femur.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the offset variant used on load transmission in the proximal femur represents another essential aspect. A biomechanical comparison of different offset variants of a modular conventional straight stem demonstrated only minor changes on overall femoral load transmission [ 10 ], whereas varus implant positioning resulted in a significant increase in the distal load transfer [ 15 ]. Relevant changes in the proximal third of the implant, particularly in the calcar region, were not found in this biomechanical investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the offset variant used on load transmission in the proximal femur represents another essential aspect. A biomechanical comparison of different offset variants of a modular conventional straight stem demonstrated only minor changes on overall femoral load transmission [ 10 ], whereas varus implant positioning resulted in a significant increase in the distal load transfer [ 15 ]. Relevant changes in the proximal third of the implant, particularly in the calcar region, were not found in this biomechanical investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 Several stem designs have been developed in human medicine to improve proximal fixation and minimize complications. 23,30 Other factors have received great attention, especially related to implant rigidity (materials with different elasticity modules), stem length and location of the porous area. Usually, the design aims to allow for a load transfer from the femoral stem to the bone in a way that is as similar as possible to the physiological transfer, minimizing the decrease in mechanical stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure associated with porous features, such as vascular channels, may have contributed influences to the stress concentrations and stress shielding around implants, yet the importance of these channels in the mechanical behaviour of cortical bone is not well understood. The design and integration of an implant and understanding of the bone‐prosthesis interface are important factors in prosthetic design, but the interaction between prosthesis and cortical bone at a fundamental microstructural level is relatively poorly understood . It is proposed that if one can characterize how the heterogeneity in the microstructure affects the macroscale stress, particularly periprosthetically, this may herald a greater potential for innovative, longer lasting prostheses designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%