2010
DOI: 10.2298/sgs1001021n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformations of the manual endodontic instruments during root canal instrumentation

Abstract: Introduction. Mechanical instrumentation of the complex root canal system is very demanding procedure which requires use of the various manual and rotary instruments. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and to verify the possible deformation of the working part of endodontic instruments after their multiple clinical use. Material and Methods. New sets of the manual endodontic instruments (reamers, K-files and Hedstroem) used in routine clinical use (44 instruments) and for root canal instrumentat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, instruments were examined before use to determine their intact surface properties, and again after the first, third (roughly after preparing one molar tooth), and sixth (roughly after preparing two molar teeth) use; instruments were evaluated qualitatively in terms of tip deformation, cutting edge deformation, presence of debris, and microcrack formation. In previous studies, dental operation microscopes, stereomicroscopes, micro‐computed tomography, atomic force microscopy, and SEM have been used to evaluate surface deformations in nickel–titanium alloys (Alapati, Brantley, Svec, Powers, & Mitchell, 2003; Nešković et al, 2010; Shen et al, 2015). We used SEM in this study (Alapati et al, 2003; Tripi, Bonaccorso, Tripi, Condorelii, & Rapisarda, 2001) up to ×1,000; SEM is considered an ideal mode of studying surface properties, as it allows repeated imaging, detailed examination, and does not cause any changes in the instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, instruments were examined before use to determine their intact surface properties, and again after the first, third (roughly after preparing one molar tooth), and sixth (roughly after preparing two molar teeth) use; instruments were evaluated qualitatively in terms of tip deformation, cutting edge deformation, presence of debris, and microcrack formation. In previous studies, dental operation microscopes, stereomicroscopes, micro‐computed tomography, atomic force microscopy, and SEM have been used to evaluate surface deformations in nickel–titanium alloys (Alapati, Brantley, Svec, Powers, & Mitchell, 2003; Nešković et al, 2010; Shen et al, 2015). We used SEM in this study (Alapati et al, 2003; Tripi, Bonaccorso, Tripi, Condorelii, & Rapisarda, 2001) up to ×1,000; SEM is considered an ideal mode of studying surface properties, as it allows repeated imaging, detailed examination, and does not cause any changes in the instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%