“…Therefore, instruments were examined before use to determine their intact surface properties, and again after the first, third (roughly after preparing one molar tooth), and sixth (roughly after preparing two molar teeth) use; instruments were evaluated qualitatively in terms of tip deformation, cutting edge deformation, presence of debris, and microcrack formation. In previous studies, dental operation microscopes, stereomicroscopes, micro‐computed tomography, atomic force microscopy, and SEM have been used to evaluate surface deformations in nickel–titanium alloys (Alapati, Brantley, Svec, Powers, & Mitchell, 2003; Nešković et al, 2010; Shen et al, 2015). We used SEM in this study (Alapati et al, 2003; Tripi, Bonaccorso, Tripi, Condorelii, & Rapisarda, 2001) up to ×1,000; SEM is considered an ideal mode of studying surface properties, as it allows repeated imaging, detailed examination, and does not cause any changes in the instruments.…”