2020
DOI: 10.1080/10428232.2020.1852865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defund the Police: Moving Towards an Anti-Carceral Social Work

Abstract: This paper addresses social work's place in the movement to "defund the police." We argue that social work's collaboration with police and use of policing constitutes carceral social work. In defining carceral social work, we specify the ways in which coercive and punitive practices are used to manage Black, Indigenous, other people of color and poor communities across four social work arenasgender-based violence, child welfare, schools, and health and mental health.To inform anti-carceral social work, we prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
99
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Divesting from antiblackness in social work also requires divesting from police-social work collaborative models and carceral social work practices. Jacobs et al (2021), define carceral social work "as a form of social work that relies on logics of White supremacy and that uses coercive and punitive practices to manage BIPOC and poor communities" (p. 39). Carceral social work includes direct partnership with police, but also implicates the profession in the myriad of "tactics dependent on the same White supremacist and coercive foundations as policing" (Jacobs et al, 2021, p. 39).…”
Section: Resisting Carcerality In Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Divesting from antiblackness in social work also requires divesting from police-social work collaborative models and carceral social work practices. Jacobs et al (2021), define carceral social work "as a form of social work that relies on logics of White supremacy and that uses coercive and punitive practices to manage BIPOC and poor communities" (p. 39). Carceral social work includes direct partnership with police, but also implicates the profession in the myriad of "tactics dependent on the same White supremacist and coercive foundations as policing" (Jacobs et al, 2021, p. 39).…”
Section: Resisting Carcerality In Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social work profession is complicit in paternalistic practices of oversight, regulation, and punishment of Black populations in ways that mimic and work in unison with law enforcement (Jacobs et al, 2021). Police and policing have no place in a profession that espouses a commitment to social justice.…”
Section: Resisting Carcerality In Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of social work scholarship concerns itself with carceral expansion and critiques the ways in which carceral logic infiltrates everyday social work practice (Bergen & Abji, 2020;Jacobs et al, 2021;Jarldorn, 2020;Kim, 2013;Mehrotra et al, 2016;O'Brien et al, 2020;Valenzuela & Alcarzar-Campos, 2020). Such infiltration is neither neutral nor natural: it reflects both neoliberalism's stranglehold on the profession and social work's historical situatedness in a positivist school of criminological thought regarding practice with criminalized populations (Roberts & Springer, 2007;Wilson, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-carceral logic proposes a radically different approach to the mental health movement, embracing traditions of interdependence and emphasizing social connectedness while utilizing a critical systems analysis to interrupt carceral response. Social work's purpose in an anti-carceral mental health movement must be not only to center the wellness of those most impacted by violence and oppression, but also to uproot methods of carceral intervention, prioritize self-determination in mental health policy, and reimagine the role of peers in new community structures of life-affirming care (Jacobs et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%