2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.97.104419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degenerate and chiral states in the extended Heisenberg model on the kagome lattice

Abstract: We present a study of the low temperature phases of the antiferromagnetic extended classical Heisenberg model in the kagome lattice, up to third nearest neighbors. First, we focus on the degenerate lines in the boundaries of the well-known staggered chiral phases. These boundaries have either semi-extensive or extensive degeneracy, and we discuss the partial selection of states by thermal fluctuations. Then, we study the model under an external magnetic field on these lines and in the staggered chiral phases. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change is reflected in the χ nn1 curves: at low fields, χ nn1 = 0, corresponding to the single-q phase, and as the system is further magnetized, it enters in the double-q phase with a non-zero net chirality. Although the singleq phase has no net chirality, a closer look reveals that the spin arrangement has an alternate chirality, similar to what has been seen in kagome for example in the cuboc phases 36,37 . This is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Double-q and Single-q Phasessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This change is reflected in the χ nn1 curves: at low fields, χ nn1 = 0, corresponding to the single-q phase, and as the system is further magnetized, it enters in the double-q phase with a non-zero net chirality. Although the singleq phase has no net chirality, a closer look reveals that the spin arrangement has an alternate chirality, similar to what has been seen in kagome for example in the cuboc phases 36,37 . This is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Double-q and Single-q Phasessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…13 A), with the two types of plaquettes illustrated in the inset. The inspection of the sublattice snapshots reveals a particular form of semiextensive generacy, similar to that seen in the extended Heisenberg model in the kagome lattice 37 : two sublattices can exchange "lines" of spins, and this gives rise to the two types of umbrella plaquettes, which have opposite chirality. In panels B and D from Fig.…”
Section: Double-q and Single-q Phasessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…11(a) and is referred to as cuboc 1 order (which appears in several contexts in kagome spin models [46]). Indeed, it has previously been realized that the line J 2 = J 3d < J 1 of the J 1 -J 2 -J 3d model as considered here, marks the phase boundary between = 0 and cuboc 1 ordered regimes [47][48][49][50]. The key question is whether defects with ∆E > 0 are local energy minima and how they are modified when performing iterative minimization as has been done for the defects in the XY-model (see Sec.…”
Section: Single Defects In the Heisenberg Modelsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Through a suitable inclusion of longer-range couplings, this degeneracy is lifted to become subextensive, hence, realizing an environment for fracton physics (see Refs. [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] for a selection of works about related kagome models with longer-range interactions). The ground and excited states may be most conveniently described by defect variables associated with local spin constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SO(3) invariant ∆ = 1 case, the classical T = 0 phase diagram of this model is well known: it presents the so called "cuboc" phases (with spontaneous and alternate scalar chirality), and a q = 0 phase 21,22 for J 3 < J 2 < J 1 . At the special line J 2 = J 3 < J 1 , the ground state has a semi-extensive degeneracy 21 where lines of spins from the q = 0 order can be "swapped". For practical reasons, we will take J 1 = 1 for the rest of the manuscript.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%