2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1682-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DegNorm: normalization of generalized transcript degradation improves accuracy in RNA-seq analysis

Abstract: RNA degradation affects RNA-seq quality when profiling transcriptional activities in cells. Here, we show that transcript degradation is both gene- and sample-specific and is a common and significant factor that may bias the results in RNA-seq analysis. Most existing global normalization approaches are ineffective to correct for degradation bias. We propose a novel pipeline named DegNorm to adjust the read counts for transcript degradation heterogeneity on a gene-by-gene basis while simultaneously controlling … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…98 Secondly, RNA sequencing was performed on samples with a wide range of RIN values. While we demonstrated that RIN was not a signi cant co-variant of differential expression, in the future methods such as DegNorm developed by Xiong et al 30 could be implemented to correct for expression variation due to differences in RNA degradation and potentially yield more accurate results. Thirdly, all samples were recruited from patients receiving cerebral imaging at a single center, which may introduce selection bias.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…98 Secondly, RNA sequencing was performed on samples with a wide range of RIN values. While we demonstrated that RIN was not a signi cant co-variant of differential expression, in the future methods such as DegNorm developed by Xiong et al 30 could be implemented to correct for expression variation due to differences in RNA degradation and potentially yield more accurate results. Thirdly, all samples were recruited from patients receiving cerebral imaging at a single center, which may introduce selection bias.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…16,44 , others have implemented statistical frameworks which account for gene-speci c biases. DegNorm, for example, accounts for the gene-speci c relative randomness in degradation in its correction approach 17 . Quality surrogate variable analysis (qSVA) speci cally improves differential expression by identifying transcript features associated with RNA degradation for its correction 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degradation introduces variability in signal and can be impacted by sample handling. Non-uniformity in degradation across genes and samples causes inaccurate normalization and transcript quanti cation 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between IA and control groups in our study, there was no statistically significant difference in RIN (p = 0.18, Student’s t-test). Yet, given that some samples had low RIN and others had high RIN, we performed co-variate correlation analysis as shown in Xiong et al [ 30 ] in order to determine if RNA quality could have affected the expression levels of differentially expressed transcripts. A correlation between gene expression and RIN was considered if it had both a Pearson correlation coefficient r > 0.80 and a p-value < 0.01.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%