1988
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2780230403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation and movement of aldicarb residues in Florida citrus soils

Abstract: The movement and degradation of the pesticide aldicarb was monitored in two Florida citrus groves. One of these was a bedded grove near Oviedo and the other was located in the central ridge near Lake Hamilton. Soil core samples were collected at 0.3 or 0.6 m depth increments six times over an eight-month period and were analyzed for aldicarb and its two oxidation products aldicarb suljoxide and aldicarb suljone. These analyses showed a relatively rapid decrease of aldicarb accompanied by an increase in aldicar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the best example is aldicarb, which forms two metabolites, both of which are more mobile than the parent [142,21IJ. Two other examples will suggest the complexity of the problem. One pesticide manufacturer complained to us that we have given a very high solubility for their compound because we assumed the salt value instead of the parent acid.…”
Section: The Significant Residue Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps the best example is aldicarb, which forms two metabolites, both of which are more mobile than the parent [142,21IJ. Two other examples will suggest the complexity of the problem. One pesticide manufacturer complained to us that we have given a very high solubility for their compound because we assumed the salt value instead of the parent acid.…”
Section: The Significant Residue Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[153,245]; 500000 [326]; sodium salt very soluble > 600000 [245,246]; 4250 (acid) [294]; 5000 (methyl ester) [153]; 24C: 4000 [235]; 550000 [116] FIELD HALF LIFE (days): 5-15 [326,327] [59]; 400 (tlc) [232]; 2100 [120,236]; 1900 (30%) [247] VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hg): 20C: < 10. 5 [245]; 25C: < 1 x W-'O [ [143,189]; 13600, 8500 [88,153]; 14000 [187]; 2500, 4600 [30]; 5300 [59]; 6085 [97]; 14800 [76]; 6100 [223]; 13490 [237] VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hg): 25C: 1.9 x 10-5 [218,245]; 35C: 9 x 10-5 [245] [142] Property values from literature with references WATER SOLUBILITY (mg/l): 25C: miscible [195,247]; 1000 [59] FIELD HALF LIFE (days): 7 [59]; 20 (50%) [247] SORPTION COEFFICIENT (mIlg): 20 [59]; 75(30%) [247] VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hg): 20C: 1 x 10" [245]; 7 x 10"5 [246]; 25C: 1.6 x 10"' [247] Selected [245,…”
Section: Appendix B: the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations