1992
DOI: 10.1080/00914039208041113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation and Stabilization of Polyacrylamide in Polymer Flooding Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PAM does not revert to AMD in the natural environment upon degradation (MacWilliams, 1978). Superfloc A836 PAM degrades at rates of at least 10% year-1 as a result of physical, chemical, biological and photochemical processes and reactions (Tolstikh et al, 1992). Because PAM is highly susceptible to UV degradation, its breakdown rate when applied at the soil surface for erosion control may be faster than the abovecited 10% year-1 reported rate, which was for biological degradation of PAM mixed into a large soil volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PAM does not revert to AMD in the natural environment upon degradation (MacWilliams, 1978). Superfloc A836 PAM degrades at rates of at least 10% year-1 as a result of physical, chemical, biological and photochemical processes and reactions (Tolstikh et al, 1992). Because PAM is highly susceptible to UV degradation, its breakdown rate when applied at the soil surface for erosion control may be faster than the abovecited 10% year-1 reported rate, which was for biological degradation of PAM mixed into a large soil volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAM degradation in soil was found to be approximately 10% year-1 (Barvenik, 1994;Tolstikh et al, 1992). Degradation of the acrylamide monomer (AMD) is fairly rapid (Lande et al, 1979;Shanker et al, 1990;Kay-Shoemake et al, 1998a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AMD is a neurotoxin, but PAMs below these AMD contents are safe, when used as directed at low concentrations (Barvenik, 1994). In soil, PAM degrades at rates of at least 10% per year as a result of physical, chemical, biological and photochemical processes and reactions (Tolstikh et al, 1992;Wallace et al, 1986;Azzam et al, 1983). Because PAM is highly susceptible to UV degradation, its breakdown rate when applied at the soil surface for erosion control may be faster than the earlier-cited 10% per year reported rate, which was for biological degradation of PAM mixed into a large soil volume.…”
Section: Environmental and Safety Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because UV and shear forces have been shown to reduce chain length (Tolstikh et al, 1992;Randby, 1993), smaller PAM molecules and UV-treated PAM solutions were used in efforts to enrich for organisms capable of utilizing these molecules for C. Treatment with UV radiation did effectively reduce PAM chain length as determined by size-exclusion HPLC (data not shown). However, the smaller PAM molecules, of MW as low as 3 000-4 000, or the UV-treated PAM preparations were not able to support bacterial growth as sole C source (data not shown).…”
Section: Carbon Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%