2012
DOI: 10.25103/jestr.054.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation Effects in sc -­‐ Si PV Modules Subjected to Natural and Induced Ageing after Several Years of Field Operation

Abstract: This paper presents ageing effects observed in sc--Si PV modules operating in field conditions for 18 and over 22 years. The effects of both natural ageing processes and induced ageing by external agents, causing partial or total shading of cells for a prolonged period of time, are examined. Optical degradation effects observed through visual inspection include discoloration of the EVA, degradation of the AR coating, degradation of the interface between the cell and encapsulant, corrosion of busbars and finger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, we have observed the rate of degradation (determined through the calculated efficacy) caused by age using a linear regression model, which is generally the accepted method [3]. The degradation rate is so low (in the order of 1 × 10 9 ) that it is impossible to determine because the changes in efficiency are within the statistical error and thus our results do not agree with the conclusions of the literature [5,8]. For midrange and polycrystalline PV panels, the degradation rates range from 0.3% to 2.9% per year [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case, we have observed the rate of degradation (determined through the calculated efficacy) caused by age using a linear regression model, which is generally the accepted method [3]. The degradation rate is so low (in the order of 1 × 10 9 ) that it is impossible to determine because the changes in efficiency are within the statistical error and thus our results do not agree with the conclusions of the literature [5,8]. For midrange and polycrystalline PV panels, the degradation rates range from 0.3% to 2.9% per year [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Kaplani [8] have studied six modules from two different field producers for 18 years and over 22 years. The modules with over 22 years of operation time were exposed to natural field conditions, whereas modules with 18 years of operation, in addition to natural aging, were exposed to the strong effects of induced aging for several months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect may be temporary as in the case of transient shadows casted on the PV modules or permanent as in the case of corrosion, delamination, etc. In the latter case their impact may increase during the lifetime of the PV module, while the degradation and aging of the PV cells becomes a governing factor in the PV power performance [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a cleaning machanism to maintain the power performance by removing the dust from the solar panel surfaces is required [1,2,3]. The Moreover, disposals which cover continuously solar panel surfaces can damage any cell in a solar module [4]. Other pollutants such as ash can also reduce the power performance of a solar panels [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%