2000
DOI: 10.1021/jf000084v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of Ethylene Thiourea (ETU) with Three Fenton Treatment Processes

Abstract: Anodic Fenton treatment (AFT), an electrochemical, hydroxyl radical oxidation treatment system, was developed for the degradation of aqueous pesticides and other aqueous organic wastes. AFT of ethylene thiourea (ETU) was optimized and compared with electrochemical Fenton treatment (EFT) and classic Fenton treatment (CFT). ETU is a known carcinogen and is an impurity and degradation product of the widely used ethylenebisdithiocarbamate (EBDC) fungicide group. ETU was degraded effectively in all treatment method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, it is noted that PQ and COD removal profiles during CFT showed rapid initial decrease followed by very slow removal rate. During CFT, the Fenton reactants were added all at once at the beginning of the treatment, in accordance with other investigations reported in the literature [68,69], leading to a rapid and efficient production of Å OH during the first minutes. However, due to quenching of Å OH through competitive parasitic reactions (with Fe 2+ and H 2 O 2 ), CFT has not a sustained hydroxyl radical production throughout the experiment, which limits the extent of PQ mineralization.…”
Section: Comparative Degradation Of Pq By Different Aops (Pef Ef Aosupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As expected, it is noted that PQ and COD removal profiles during CFT showed rapid initial decrease followed by very slow removal rate. During CFT, the Fenton reactants were added all at once at the beginning of the treatment, in accordance with other investigations reported in the literature [68,69], leading to a rapid and efficient production of Å OH during the first minutes. However, due to quenching of Å OH through competitive parasitic reactions (with Fe 2+ and H 2 O 2 ), CFT has not a sustained hydroxyl radical production throughout the experiment, which limits the extent of PQ mineralization.…”
Section: Comparative Degradation Of Pq By Different Aops (Pef Ef Aosupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The non-acidic MTBE degradation products were not found to decrease in 60 min in this system in the control experiments without any Fenton reagent (data not shown); to explain this, more experiments would need to be conducted, which is beyond the scope of this work. Anodic Fenton treatment (AFT) used a half-cell technology developed in this laboratory and described by Saltmiras and Lemley [36]. The anode was made from cold rolled steel plates immersed in the aqueous MTBE solution.…”
Section: Reaction Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saltmiras and Lemley [36] developed a novel anodic Fenton treatment (AFT) system that allows the Fenton reaction to occur in an anodic half-cell. The cathode cell and anode cell were connected by a salt bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes in situ generate the Fenton reagents (H 2 O 2 and/or Fe 2+ ) to yield OH • radicals [36,37]. The EF processes such as Fered-Fenton (EF-FeRe) [38,39], electrochemical peroxidation/anodic Fenton (EF-FeOx) [40][41][42], electro-Fenton (EF-H 2 O 2 -FeRe) [38,43], and peroxi-coagulation (EF-H 2 O 2 -FeOx) [44,45] increase the efficiency of pollutant degradation. The efficiency of pollutant degradation is enhanced when UV light or solar irradiation is used in combination with CF (photo-Fenton or solar photo-Fenton) and EF (photoelectro-Fenton or solar photoelectro-Fenton) processes.…”
Section: The Electrochemical Fenton-based (Ef) Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%