2011
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201000072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of Phenol in Aqueous Solution by Fenton, Sono‐Fenton and Sono‐photo‐Fenton Methods

Abstract: Degradation of Phenol in Aqueous Solution by Fenton, Sono-Fenton and Sono-photo-Fenton MethodsThe present work focuses on the performance of Fenton, sono-Fenton, and sono-photoFenton processes for the oxidation of phenol present in aqueous solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 reveals that, the pH that yields the major oxidation of phenol via a photoFenton process is 2.8, under the current experimental conditions and range of pH studied. In fact, it is known that Fenton processes are more efficient at pH close to 3 because the oxidation potential of the hydroxyl radical adopts its highest value (2.80 V) [25]. The profile of disappearance of phenol shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kinetic Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5 reveals that, the pH that yields the major oxidation of phenol via a photoFenton process is 2.8, under the current experimental conditions and range of pH studied. In fact, it is known that Fenton processes are more efficient at pH close to 3 because the oxidation potential of the hydroxyl radical adopts its highest value (2.80 V) [25]. The profile of disappearance of phenol shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kinetic Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is clearly related to the stability of H 2 O 2 which is strongly affected by pH. In Fenton chemistry, it is generally accepted that iron hydroxide can be formed at a pH above 4, which is not favorable for the generation of hydroxyl radical species . A lower pH is favorable for stabilizing H 2 O 2 but the formation of H 3 O 2 + , which occurs at a pH below 2, is not desirable for the formation of reactive hydroxyl radical species .…”
Section: Catalytic Performance For the Selective Oxidation Of Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As said above, the optimum working pH is around 3, regardless of the target substrate [19,[42][43][44] …”
Section: Inflluence Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%