Degradation Rates of Plastics in the Environment

Abstract

Plastic waste is currently generated at a rate approaching 400 Mt year–1. The amount of plastics accumulating in the environment is growing rapidly, yet our understanding of its persistence is very limited. This Perspective summarizes the existing literature on environmental degradation rates and pathways for the major types of thermoplastic polymers. A metric to harmonize disparate types of measurements, the specific surface degradation rate (SSDR), is implemented and used to extrapolate half-lives. SSDR values cover a very wide range, with some of the variability arising due to degradation studies conducted in different natural environments. SSDRs for high density polyethylene (HDPE) in the marine environment range from practically 0 to approximately 11 μm year–1. This approach yields a number of interesting insights. Using a mean SSDR for HDPE in the marine environment, linear extrapolation leads to estimated half-lives ranging from 58 years (bottles) to 1200 years (pipes). For example, SSDRs for HDPE and polylactic acid (PLA) are surprisingly similar in the marine environment, although PLA degrades approximately 20 times faster than HDPE on land. Our study highlights the need for better experimental studies under well-defined reaction conditions, standardized reporting of rates, and methods to simulate polymer degradation using.

Environmental Sustainability of Plastic in Agriculture

“…Apart from the modification of the microstructural properties to achieve better mechanical properties, optical reflectance, and customizable transmission of UV radiation (optical and radiometric properties), the rate of natural degradation and compostability predicts the environmental sustainability of plastics in agricultural settings. Synthetic plastics such as HDPE, PET, and PP plastics are not biodegradable; this is demonstrated by the low specific surface degradation rate (SSDR) of 10 2 and 10 3 μm/year [50]. The limited biodegradability of these structures is attributed to the unique chemical properties and bonding.…”

“…Micro-plastics are small plastic fragments with a size that varies between 0.5 and 5 mm [50], which originate from plastic additives and plastic debris [61]. In 2020, there were at least, 250,000 tons and 51 trillion pieces of micro-plastics [61].…”

“…The unique fragmentation behaviors also limit the formation of biofilms, and by extension the probability of decomposition. In contrast to biofilms, which are degraded naturally in the environment, micro-plastics exhibit oxygen incorporation, which translates to an increase in the mass and the attraction of micro-organisms [50], which may latter aid the degradation process. However, since the degradation process is slow the risk of ingestion by marine species remains high [62]; this would impact human health considering that seafood is a staple diet in coastal areas.…”

Densification of Biomass and Waste Plastic Blends as a Solid Fuel: Hazards, Advantages, and Perspectives

“…The co-densification of biomass and plastic wastes can be considered as a step closer to a circular bioeconomy that can achieve a reduction of over 80% (assuming 90% wood and 10% plastics) of greenhouse gas emission compared with the use of coal (Eriksson and Finnveden, 2009). Meanwhile, combusting plastic wastes as a fuel can also achieve the rapid degradation of these non-biodegradable polymers, rather than degradation in the environment with long-lasting pollution (Chamas et al, 2020).…”

Enhanced Photodegradation Stability in Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) Composites Using Organically Modified Layered Zinc Phenylphosphonate

“…Most nonbiodegradable plastic wastes cause significant land and marine pollution [ 1 ]. This problem has changed the direction of serious attention towards ecological sustainability and the possible impact on related animals and plants [ 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”