2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-010-9237-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degrading network capacity may improve performance: private versus public monitoring in the Braess Paradox

Abstract: The Braess Paradox (BP) is a counterintuitive finding that degrading a network that is susceptible to congestion may decrease the equilibrium travel cost for each of its users. We illustrate this paradox with two networks: a basic network with four alternative routes from a single origin to a single destination, and an augmented network with six alternative routes. We construct the equilibrium solutions to these two networks, which jointly give rise to the paradox, and subject them to experimental testing. Our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
31
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The major contribution of this article is the analysis of route choice behavior in traffic networks with splittable flow in which coordination is centralized within but not between cohorts. Our analysis of game G(S4) further extends the findings of earlier studies (e.g., Gisches and Rapoport , Morgan et al. , Rapoport et al.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major contribution of this article is the analysis of route choice behavior in traffic networks with splittable flow in which coordination is centralized within but not between cohorts. Our analysis of game G(S4) further extends the findings of earlier studies (e.g., Gisches and Rapoport , Morgan et al. , Rapoport et al.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Implementing a within-subject design, our results show that play in the basic network converges to equilibrium quite rapidly within 15 or so rounds. In contrast, route choices in the augmented network gradually approach, but do not converge, to equilibrium at a considerably slower rate (see Rapoport 2012 andRapoport et al 2008 for similar results). If convergence is to be established in the laboratory, longer sessions with more rounds might be required.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A similar phenomenon has been reported in transportation systems, where the flow through a system can be increased if connections are removed [34]. The Braess Paradox describes the situation where adding a seemingly helpful link can have a negative effect on the flow through the network [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Others investigated the effect of private monitoring, that is, at each turn individuals were informed only of their performance and not of the whole network performance as in public monitoring (Morgan, Orzen, and Sefton 2009). Yet, no patterns of route choice that increase efficiency were observed (Gisches and Rapoport 2012).…”
Section: The Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%