2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-020-09299-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degree achievements and degree morphemes in competition in Southern Aymara

Abstract: In this paper, I give an account of degree achievements in Southern Aymara, an understudied Andean language. I focus on degree achievements that are derived from gradable bases by means of the verbal suffix -cha, e.g., llusk'a-cha-ña 'to straighten' or q'añu-cha-ña 'to dirty'. I provide arguments suggesting that Aymara should be analyzed as a degree language (Bochnak 2015b). I further propose an analysis of Aymara degree achievements in terms of a differential measure function (Kennedy & Levin 2008). The main … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I assume that base predicates could be gradable (Kennedy and McNally 2005;Martínez Vera 2020;Pedersen 2015;Piñón 2008) or non-gradable (Heim and Kratzer 1998;Morzycki 2009). With regard to the former, following Kennedy and McNally (2005), I assume that scales S are sets of linearly ordered degrees d along some dimension associated with a base predicate.…”
Section: Assumptions On Base Predicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I assume that base predicates could be gradable (Kennedy and McNally 2005;Martínez Vera 2020;Pedersen 2015;Piñón 2008) or non-gradable (Heim and Kratzer 1998;Morzycki 2009). With regard to the former, following Kennedy and McNally (2005), I assume that scales S are sets of linearly ordered degrees d along some dimension associated with a base predicate.…”
Section: Assumptions On Base Predicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derived change of state verbs in English, as in (1), have been analyzed in one of two ways, broadly speaking: (i) in terms of a transition from not being in the extension of a base predicate to being in such an extension (i.e., total change or BECOME P, for base predicate P) (Abusch 1986;Dowty 1979) or (ii) in terms of a theme increasing in the extent to which it holds the property indicated by the base predicate (i.e., relative change or BECOME more P for base predicate P) (Hay et al 1999;Kearns 2007;Kennedy 2012;Kennedy and Levin 2008;Martínez Vera 2020;Pedersen 2015;Winter 2006). Depending on the approach, (1) would thus be interpreted in terms of one of the following: (i) the soup changed from not being cool to being cool (in a given context of utterance) or (ii) the soup increased in coolness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%