2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degree of composite action verification of bolted GFRP bridge deck-to-girder connection system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors explain this by the viscosity effects and invisible micro-cracking in the concrete, rather than slipping which was minimal at the observed location. Another study of composite action based on the neutral axis was performed by Park et al [11] on a Fiber Reinforced Plastic deck connected to a steel girder. The neutral axis was identified and the composite action evaluated.…”
Section: Laboratory Tests and Controlled Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors explain this by the viscosity effects and invisible micro-cracking in the concrete, rather than slipping which was minimal at the observed location. Another study of composite action based on the neutral axis was performed by Park et al [11] on a Fiber Reinforced Plastic deck connected to a steel girder. The neutral axis was identified and the composite action evaluated.…”
Section: Laboratory Tests and Controlled Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the fracture test and the structural analysis using the ABAQUS, a commercial finite element analysis program, can be shown in Table 3. In ABAQUS analysis, the bolt connection of FRP deck and steel girder was simply simulated using the coupling constraints for the FRP Deck bottom flange node and steel girder top flange node on the bolt connection positions as proposed by Park et al [7], and linear elastic ranges are considered as analysis boundary. And also the S4R element, which is known to be as good to FRP bridge deck modeling for analysis is considered in this analysis.…”
Section: Shape Of the Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently different types of connectors result in different level of interaction between the steel and FRP structural members, referred to as hybrid interaction. Park et al (2006) investigated the level of hybrid interaction that can be achieved with bolted connectors. Davalos et al (2012) also investigated the level of hybrid interaction but for shear connectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%