2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
180
5
20

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
180
5
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Evangelista et al 13 found that maxillary canines and first premolars showed a high prevalence of dehiscence when they compared the presence of periodontal defects in different malocclusions. Our results showed that, at first the maxillary canine and first premolar suffered from periodontal consequences because of malocclusion and skeletal differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evangelista et al 13 found that maxillary canines and first premolars showed a high prevalence of dehiscence when they compared the presence of periodontal defects in different malocclusions. Our results showed that, at first the maxillary canine and first premolar suffered from periodontal consequences because of malocclusion and skeletal differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The total root length of each tooth was determined from axial and crosssectional images at the buccal and palatal surfaces. If the images showed no cortical bone around the root in at least three sequential views, the defects were recorded as dehiscence and fenestration ( Figure 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the upper canines and first premolars, Al-Belasy and Hairam 2) reported that infection can easily spread to the infraorbital space. Meanwhile, regarding the frequency of perforation of the labial wall of the maxillary alveolar process, Evangelista et al 6) reported rates of dehiscence and fenestration of 18.73 and 17.87%, respectively, for canines and 18.45 and 18.06%, respectively, for first premolars. In other words, with the syringe method for calcium hydroxide paste, if root canal configuration is inappropriate, then, anatomically, leakage from the root apex and displacement into the infraorbital space can easily occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Sun et al 12 reported that this method might overestimate the actual measurements, the technique was reported to have the highest sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for detecting various periodontal defects. 21 A few studies 9,25,26 have analyzed dehiscences and fenestrations by CBCT in different malocclusion groups and normal populations. However, no data were available for patients with clefts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that dehiscences were more prevalent than fenestrations and were associated with half the teeth (51.9%); the proportion was 36.5% for fenestration. 26 Similarly, dehiscences and fenestrations were assessed with CBCT in skeletal Classes I, II, and III malocclusions. 25 The Class II group had a greater prevalence of fenestrations, and dehiscences were seen with a high frequency in the mandibular incisors of all groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%