1994
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90056-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dehydration and the threat to East Anglian fens, England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These strategies often include measures to restore individual fen reserves e.g. by removing abstraction wells from recharge areas as suggested by, amongst others, Fojt (1994), or by lowering the ground surface of fen reserves by means of top-soil removal as suggested by Van der Hoek and Heijmans (2007). In order to mitigate habitat fragmentation of low-productive fens, however, a spatially coherent hydrological fen restoration strategy is required that is also suitable to restore zones of ceased groundwater supply outside the current fen reserves, as these zones are thought to be less suitable for the establishment of most fen plants (Sjörs and Gunnarsson, 2002), and thus may form barriers against fen plant dispersal.…”
Section: Hydrological Fen Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These strategies often include measures to restore individual fen reserves e.g. by removing abstraction wells from recharge areas as suggested by, amongst others, Fojt (1994), or by lowering the ground surface of fen reserves by means of top-soil removal as suggested by Van der Hoek and Heijmans (2007). In order to mitigate habitat fragmentation of low-productive fens, however, a spatially coherent hydrological fen restoration strategy is required that is also suitable to restore zones of ceased groundwater supply outside the current fen reserves, as these zones are thought to be less suitable for the establishment of most fen plants (Sjörs and Gunnarsson, 2002), and thus may form barriers against fen plant dispersal.…”
Section: Hydrological Fen Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These degradation processes are often triggered by a shift in the origin of groundwater supply as a result of water management practices. In particular, drainage (Schot et al, 2004) and groundwater abstractions (Fojt, 1994) are thought to prevent groundwater from entering the fen root zone, because they intercept groundwater that is potentially directed to the fen surface. This decreased supply of groundwater may cause a fall in groundwater tables and enhances the infiltration of local precipitation and surface water (Van Wirdum, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the close relationship between groundwater and wetlands, wetlands are clearly vulnerable to the effects of groundwater abstraction (Foyt 1994a;Kadza 1995). Water table draw-down in areas surrounding abstraction boreholes creates a cone of depression in unconfi ned aquifers.…”
Section: Impact Of Groundwater Abstraction On Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere in the region abstraction has been permitted despite the anticipated effects on wetlands. This includes Redgrave and Lopham Fen, although they are SSSI wetlands and listed as internationally important according to the Ramsar Convention (Denny 1993;Harding 1993;Foyt 1994a). One may ask why an increase in abstraction was granted?…”
Section: Mitigating and Managing The Effects Of Groundwater Abstractimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maintenance of this type of mire system is dependent upon sustained groundwater supply. Consequently, the reduction of aquifer water tables, resulting from groundwater abstraction for public water supply and agricultural irrigation, is seen as a major threat to this type of mire (Fojt 1994(Fojt , 1995. However, the effect is not always easy to assess, partly because of a lack of former vegetation records, and also because deleterious changes can occur for other reasons (e.g.…”
Section: Spring and Seepage Fensmentioning
confidence: 99%