2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene using Pt, Mo, and Pt–Mo catalysts supported on clay nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the intensity of the first reduction peak decreased significantly when the IMP was used. This behavior could be as a because the Pt surface was modified by the Mo species, because the latter is as three-fold as the former [28]. This modification will be discussed later using the CO-FTIR and XPS measurements.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the intensity of the first reduction peak decreased significantly when the IMP was used. This behavior could be as a because the Pt surface was modified by the Mo species, because the latter is as three-fold as the former [28]. This modification will be discussed later using the CO-FTIR and XPS measurements.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…150 • C, which corresponds to the Pt particles reduced to Pt 0 completely; at ca. 240 • C, attributed to the reduction of Pt interacting with the support [27,28]; and from 450 • C, attributed to reduction of MoO 3 and the complete reduction, as well as the metal-support interactions [28,29]. However, the intensity of the first reduction peak decreased significantly when the IMP was used.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time, both the catalyst and the process have undergone several improvements, such as the introduction of beds with radial flow and the use of poison inhibitors (Shreve and Brink, 1997). Several works have been carried out (Santos et al, 2006;Rangel et al, 2003;Ramos et al, 2008;Miyakoshi et al, 2001;Liao et al, 2008) aiming to improve the iron-based catalysts or to find new alternatives systems and process conditions (Holtz et al, 2008;Oliveira et al, 2008;Morán et al, 2007;Ohishi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Ethylbenzene Dehydrogenation In the Presence Of Carbon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first one, ST is produced as a sideproduct in the epoxidation of propene with ethylbenzene (EB) hydroperoxide with Mo complex based catalysts. The second one and also the most important manufacturing route to ST is by the direct dehydrogenation of EB on iron oxide catalysts at 873-973 K, just below the decomposition temperature of the reactant [2,[6][7][8][9]. Because the reaction is highly endothermic and volume-increasing, a large amount of superheated steam is used to supply heat, decline the partial pressure of the reactants to shift the equilibrium to ST, and inhibit the buildup of coke or of coke precursors on catalyst surface to prolong the catalyst activity, and eventually keep the iron oxide in an appropriate oxidation state [8,[10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%