Del trabajo productivo y motivado al imperativo psicológico del descanso: Medellín, 1928-1975

Abstract

Objective/Context: This article analyzes how work was valued as a socializing, adaptive, and objectified resource by a set of psychological discourses and practices in Medellín between 1928 and 1975, seeking to offer an account of the gradual process of psychologization of the work environment in that city during the proposed period. Methodology: To the effect, a detailed bibliographical review was carried out, gathering written sources, particularly theses, newspapers, and magazines. The analysis and systematization of this information reveals how worker emotionality was the object of a set of psychological therapies and observations on psychosomatic conditions, as part of an exercise of growing responsibility over oneself. Originality: There is little concern in national historiography about examining in depth the forms of labor performance management through psychological discourses and practices. Hence, the novelty and relevance of this article lies in the study of historical relations between power and knowledge, between “psi” discourses and practices and labor productivity. In other words, the article is relevant in that it explores how the reality of the world of work has been incorporated into contemporary performance imperatives. Conclusions: The article evidences a progressive emotional intervention that optimized behaviors and gave rise to a new work ethic. Enthusiasm for productive work was built under criteria of knowledge of personality, social valorization, growing emotional management, and demand for regulated rest. The gradual psychologization of the work environment also sought to establish a device for detecting and calibrating emotional ailments triggered by excesses in work and the surrounding social environment.

La gran renuncia, aspectos psicológicos, económicos, y la resiliencia organizacional en EUA y México

“…Existen variables vitales que no regresan, como la salud y el tiempo, de tal forma que el uso del tiempo que los trabajadores dedicaban a transportarse al trabajo pueden usarlo ahora para estudiar por medios electrónicos algo que realmente les interese y que consideren que los hace crecer como personas. De acuerdo con López (2021), 85 % de los trabajadores odiaban sus trabajos ya antes de la pandemia; esto tiene que ver con las relaciones que se establecen dentro de las empresas (Castaño, 2022), falta de compromiso (Sumarsi y Rizal, 2022), falta de propósito, sentido de pertenencia (Peng, Chen, Barnes y Kladou, 2022), falta de optimismo (Laskin y Mikhalovna Nesova, 2022), falta de sentirse productivos (Leutner, Akhtar y Chamorro-Premuzic, 2022), sentir la misión de la empresa (Lashway, 2022) y tener conexiones reales con sus jefes (Blakeman y Taylor, 2022). Todo esto, como puede verse, está relacionado con condiciones tóxicas de trabajo (Lahdenperä et al, 2022), cultura, política y el burnout.…”