2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delamination fatigue growth in polymer-matrix fibre composites: A methodology for determining the design and lifing allowables

Abstract: The introduction, originally in 2009, by the FAA of a 'slow growth' approach to the certification of polymer-matrix fibre composites has focused attention on the experimental data and the analytical tools needed to assess the growth of delaminations under cyclic-fatigue loads. Of direct relevance is the fact that fatigue tests on aircraft composite components and structures reveal that no, or only little, retardation of the fatigue crack growth (FCG) rate occurs as delamination/impact damage grows. Therefore, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All data obtained on different specimens, tested under different loading conditions, collapse together when evaluated with the Hartman-Schijve relationship, yielding a similar curve as the zero-bridging curve presented here. The position and slope of the curve in [32] seems to agree rather well with the curves presented here, which indicates there are more ways to verify the validity of delamination resistance curves.…”
Section: Ways Forward To Standardizationsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All data obtained on different specimens, tested under different loading conditions, collapse together when evaluated with the Hartman-Schijve relationship, yielding a similar curve as the zero-bridging curve presented here. The position and slope of the curve in [32] seems to agree rather well with the curves presented here, which indicates there are more ways to verify the validity of delamination resistance curves.…”
Section: Ways Forward To Standardizationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, if the specimens are no longer available, either because specimens have been taken apart for post-mortem investigations, or because specimens have been thrown away, data might still be used. This is demonstrated recently in [32] using the same dataset from [26] but evaluated with the Hartman-Schijve relationship [33] proposed previously by Jones et al [34][35] [36]. All data obtained on different specimens, tested under different loading conditions, collapse together when evaluated with the Hartman-Schijve relationship, yielding a similar curve as the zero-bridging curve presented here.…”
Section: Ways Forward To Standardizationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…We also know [19][20][21][22][23] that the Hartman-Schijve equation, i.e., Equation (2) with the term ∆K replaced by ∆ √ G and K max replaced by √ G max where G is the energy release rate (for metals, √ G is linearly proportional to K), also holds for cracking in adhesives and delamination growth in both composites and nano-composites. It is also known [20,21] that the large scatter seen in the delamination growth curves is also captured by allowing for the variability in the term ∆ √ G thr and the effect of the test protocol on the cyclic fracture toughness term A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 13 provides a comparison between the upper-bound given in [30] As expected, the upper-bound FDG curve slightly locates on the left side of these experimental data, indicating a faster crack growth. The results given in Fig.…”
Section: Fatigue Data Interpreted With the Modified Paris Lawmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It is worth highlighting that the use of the modified Paris relation in fatigue data interpretation indeed determines FDG behaviors free of fibre bridging. In a recent study [30], a novel methodology based on statistical analysis has been proposed to determine an "upper-bound" FDG curve, which represents fatigue delamination with no or very little bridging retardation and takes inherent data scatter into account. Fig.…”
Section: Fatigue Data Interpreted With the Modified Paris Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%