2012
DOI: 10.2478/s13531-012-0018-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delamination of impacted composite structures by cohesive zone interface elements and tiebreak contact

Abstract: Maximising impact protection of fibre reinforced plastic (FRP) laminated composite structures and predicting and preventing the negative effects of impact on these structures are paramount design criteria for ground and space vehicles. In this paper the low velocity impact response of these structures will be investigated. The current work is based on the application of explicit finite element software for modelling the behaviour of laminated composite plates under low velocity impact loading and it explores t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several different ways exist to incorporate a CZM in a finite element setting, e.g. using interface elements [11,70,71] or generalized contact elements [72]. More recently, cohesive zone approaches have been proposed within extended FEM [73][74][75] and embedded mesh formulations [76,77], or using isogeometric discretizations [78][79][80][81].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several different ways exist to incorporate a CZM in a finite element setting, e.g. using interface elements [11,70,71] or generalized contact elements [72]. More recently, cohesive zone approaches have been proposed within extended FEM [73][74][75] and embedded mesh formulations [76,77], or using isogeometric discretizations [78][79][80][81].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where NLS is the maximum separation in the normal direction, TLS is the maximum separation in the tangential direction, 1 δ and 2 δ are the tangential relative displacements of mode II loading mode, and 3 δ is the normal relative displacement of mode I loading mode. NLS and TLS are the key values, representing the maximum normal and tangential separation of the contact surface.…”
Section: Theory Of Adhesive Layer Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The property of interfacial material between panel and core is a main topic on research. Dogan et al [3] compared the interlayer damage of fiber-reinforced composite material with MAT 185 and tiebreak contact under low-speed impact using LS-DYNA, and contrasted with experiment to get the optimal model. Meanwhile, it was proposed that the element size, number of material layers, and contact parameter have a great influence on the calculation results, and the follow-up research is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact these structures have the capabilities of simple composite structures and reinforcement composite structures simultaneously . Fiber buckling and fiber breakage, matrix cracking and fracture, shear damage modes, delamination , debonding between ribs and skin, large deformation and perforation, plastic deflections, and a combination of these damage mechanisms, are possible damage mechanisms which could happens to these structures during different loading situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%