Delamination Under Fatigue Loads in Composite Laminates: A Review on the Observed Phenomenology and Computational Methods

Abstract

Advanced design methodologies enable lighter and more reliable composite structures or components. However, efforts to include fatigue delamination in the simulation of composites have not yet been consolidated. Besides that, there is a lack of a proper categorization of the published methods in terms of their predictive capabilities and the principles they are based on. This paper reviews the available experimental observations, the phenomenological models, and the computational simulation methods for the three phases of delamination (initiation, onset, and propagation). It compiles a synthesis of the current state-of-the-art while identifying the unsolved problems and the areas where research is missing. It is concluded that there is a lack of knowledge, or there are unsolved problems, in all categories in the field, but particularly in the category of computational methods, which in turn prevents its inclusion in the structural design process. Suggested areas where short-term and midterm research should be focused to overcome the current situation are identified.

Prediction of the mechanical behavior of flax polypropylene composites based on multi-scale finite element analysis

“…Due to continued efforts for several decades, both numerical and analytical models have been developed for the mechanical capability prediction of carbon and glass fibers. Review articles which summarized the latest simulation techniques for fiber-reinforced composites are also available in the literature with sufficient coverage [11,12]. There are review works focusing on specific mechanical properties of composites.…”

A two-dimensional in situ fatigue cohesive zone model for crack propagation in composites under cyclic loading

“…There already exists a large body of literature in developing CZMs for fatigue loading by several groups [41,32,39,13,23,18,20,30] and a recent review has been given by [3]. The majority of these fatigue cohesive laws employ Paris laws to guide the cohesive crack propagation rate [39,13,23,20].…”

“…As mentioned earlier, one of [20]. 3 For steady-state fatigue crack growth under LEFM dominant conditions, accurate estimate of the ERR is the most important and absolute value of the cohesive strength is of secondary importance. Thus many fatigue CZM analyses have used artificially lowered cohesive strength values and still were able to get reasonable predictions (e.g.…”

“…Here we shall use typical composite fatigue limit strength values ofr f 0 = 60 MPa andŝ f 0 = 60 MPa 3. …”

An automated methodology for mode II delamination tests under fatigue loading based on the real time monitoring of the specimen’s compliance

“…Interlaminar fractures, delamina-3 tions, may appear in these structural components as a result of various load 4 situations encountered during service. Delamination initiation and growth 5 under repeated or cycling loads is a damage mechanism that should be consid-6 ered in the design stage, from the experimental characterization of materials 7 to the use of advanced numerical simulation tools [1]. With regards to the 8 experimental characterization, simple coupons under particular load modes 9 (mode I, II or mixed mode) are tested at the base of the test pyramid.…”