2021
DOI: 10.1109/tccn.2021.3066619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay-Aware and Energy-Efficient Computation Offloading in Mobile-Edge Computing Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes the aforementioned classical optimization techniques very limited as they are mainly modeled based on a network snapshot and they must be reformulated when the dynamics changes over time. Besides, most of them need a high number of iterations and may provide a local rather than global optimum [8]. In fact, they mainly use heuristics to yield feasible solutions, which makes them subject to two major limitations [25] [26] [27]:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the aforementioned classical optimization techniques very limited as they are mainly modeled based on a network snapshot and they must be reformulated when the dynamics changes over time. Besides, most of them need a high number of iterations and may provide a local rather than global optimum [8]. In fact, they mainly use heuristics to yield feasible solutions, which makes them subject to two major limitations [25] [26] [27]:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An online algorithm based on Lyapunov optimization is proposed to jointly determine edge server site selection and energy harvesting. Work [16] investigated computation offloading in a dynamic MEC system with multiple edge servers, where computational tasks with various requirements were dynamically generated by IoT devices and then offloaded to MEC servers in a time-varying operating environment. e objective of this work is to maximize the task completion time and minimize the energy consumption of IoT devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the individual evaluation algorithm, all the individuals of rank 0 and rank 1 in the set P t B are put into the set P t 0 and P t 1 , respectively (8) If (P t 0 ≠ Φ) (9) select the optimal solution in P t 0 as the result and the algorithm ends (10) else (11) For P t B , the immune clonal selection algorithm is implemented to get P t I (12) Clear set P t 0 and P t 1 . According to the individual evaluation algorithm, all the individuals of rank 0 and rank 1 in the set P t B are put into the set P t 0 and P t 1 , respectively (13) If (P t 0 ≠ Φ) (14) select the optimal solution in P t 0 as the result and the algorithm ends (15) else (16) According to the individual evaluation algorithm, put the first n individuals in the set P t B ∪ P t I into P t+1 (17) t � t + 1 (18) end if (19) end if (20) end while (21) end if (22) select a solution randomly from P t 1 as the result and the algorithm ends ALGORITHM 2: Hybrid immune and bat scheduling algorithm (HIBSA). [33][34][35][36] 2 e upper frequency of bat fr min [33][34][35][36] 0 e lower frequency of bat α [37][38][39] 0.9 e update parameter of the loudness of bat c [37][38][39] 0. time of HIBSA is only 0.93. at is, the scheduling time of the algorithm proposed in this paper is only 93% of the TPGSA algorithm.…”
Section: Execution Time Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by these facts, we propose a multi-MEC server and multi-IoT device cellular network structure and investigate a weighted sum of multiple objectives minimization optimization problem in this paper. The weighted sum of multiple objectives optimization problems in dynamic MEC systems were also studied in [19][20][21], but the optimization objectives and system models are different to ours. The key differences between the relevant works and our work are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%