2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-net.2017.0090
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay‐aware data collecting protocol for low‐duty‐cycle wireless sensor networks

Abstract: Duty-cycled technology has been introduced as an efficient way to preserve node energy and prolong network lifetime for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). However, many applications with real-time feature require that some message must be sent to the sink node within a limited time. The authors propose a novel data collecting scheme-MTDR which aims to minimise transmission delay in low-duty-cycle WSNs. In MTDR, all the nodes are assigned to the corresponding levels according to the hop count to the sink node, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He et al targeted the problem of transmission delay and to overcome the problem proposes an algorithm minimise transmission delay routing (MTDR). The performance of MTDR is compared with existing expected sleep latency (ESL) and shortest path route (SPR) algorithms and minimised a significant amount of delay [20]. Zhang and Li [21] used joint probability of data packet numbers and the sensor phases in various modes of wireless nodes in duty-cycled WSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al targeted the problem of transmission delay and to overcome the problem proposes an algorithm minimise transmission delay routing (MTDR). The performance of MTDR is compared with existing expected sleep latency (ESL) and shortest path route (SPR) algorithms and minimised a significant amount of delay [20]. Zhang and Li [21] used joint probability of data packet numbers and the sensor phases in various modes of wireless nodes in duty-cycled WSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time delay depends on the path transmission delay, which is directly proportional to the number of hops between the sender and sink. It also depends on the waiting time spent waiting for the sink or receiver to wake up [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%