2013
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2012.2227790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay-Based Back-Pressure Scheduling in Multihop Wireless Networks

Abstract: Scheduling is a critical and challenging resource allocation mechanism for multihop wireless networks. It is well known that scheduling schemes that favor links with larger queue length can achieve high throughput performance. However, these queue-length-based schemes could potentially suffer from large (even infinite) packet delays due to the well-known last packet problem, whereby packets belonging to some flows may be excessively delayed due to lack of subsequent packet arrivals. Delay-based schemes have th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we give a brief overview of SPNs, and we show that the multi-hop switched queueing network and the Back-Pressure policy described above are special cases of the SPN model and the Maximum Pressure policy studied in [20], respectively. The reason we do this is two-fold: (i) all fluid models of multi-hop switched queueing networks under the Back-Pressure policy that have appeared thus far assume fixed routing [17,37,38,43]. By appealing to the very broad modeling class of SPNs we are able to extract a concrete fluid model …”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we give a brief overview of SPNs, and we show that the multi-hop switched queueing network and the Back-Pressure policy described above are special cases of the SPN model and the Maximum Pressure policy studied in [20], respectively. The reason we do this is two-fold: (i) all fluid models of multi-hop switched queueing networks under the Back-Pressure policy that have appeared thus far assume fixed routing [17,37,38,43]. By appealing to the very broad modeling class of SPNs we are able to extract a concrete fluid model …”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there is growing literature on fluid models of the Max-Weight and Back-Pressure policies in a variety of settings, e.g., single-hop and multi-hop switched queueing networks, as well as stochastic processing networks [17,20,37,38,43,57]. Although the present paper employs very similar fluid models and in that sense builds on these prior works, our objective is quite different: fluid approximations have been used in existing literature in order to prove stability of the corresponding queueing networks or state-space collapse phenomena under critical loads, while in the present paper to facilitate a delay analysis in the presence heavy-tailed traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed to solve the delay problem of backpressure algorithms [10][11][12][13][14]. Instead of using queue differentials as weights of the MaxWeight problem, [11] proposes representing weights with delay information of packets in the queues.…”
Section: A Backpressure Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using queue differentials as weights of the MaxWeight problem, [11] proposes representing weights with delay information of packets in the queues. The idea is that packets that have already experienced high delays are more likely to be scheduled for transmission in the next time slot, whereas the original backpressure algorithm would give longer queues higher priority irrespective of the delay experienced by packets.…”
Section: A Backpressure Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, both the time-varying nature of wireless channels and the scheduling policy significantly affect the regularity of the received data of each mobile user. The traditional scheduling policies aiming to maximize the system throughput (e.g., [10], [17], and [22]) or provide various fairness guarantees (e.g., [3], [16], [18], and [21]) at the base station side do not take users' experience into account and thus lead to the high irregularity of the received data of mobile users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%