2012
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2011.2157284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay Compensation in Model Predictive Current Control of a Three-Phase Inverter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
400
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 983 publications
(413 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
400
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The above future reference current needed for the cost function is acquired in the Lagrange extrapolation, with the past and present reference values, by [25] …”
Section: Conventional Predictive Current Control Methods For Single-phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above future reference current needed for the cost function is acquired in the Lagrange extrapolation, with the past and present reference values, by [25] …”
Section: Conventional Predictive Current Control Methods For Single-phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in [13], it is convenient to perform the prediction two time steps ahead to reduce the effects of the delay introduced by the implementation of FCS-MPC in a digital platform. Another possibility to avoid the effect of the computation delay is to use a control strategy that only requires a small computation time.…”
Section: Fcs-mpc Control Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to compensate for the delay between command generation and its effective realization, [24] suggests two-step-ahead prediction of the states. In our case, one state is the stator flux (λ) which is given by the flux-observer that already serves as a one-stepahead predictor because the flux-observer's inputs are the voltage commands applied at previous switching and sampling instant, if switching is synchronized with sampling.…”
Section: Model Predictive Control Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, (9) is shifted one step forward in time. We use two-step-ahead prediction of [24] only for the current (i sq ) state variable, using (11). …”
Section: Model Predictive Control Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%