2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2019.2957125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay Compensation of Demand Response and Adaptive Disturbance Rejection Applied to Power System Frequency Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper bound structure in (9) is statedependent. In multi-area LFC, state-dependent uncertainties naturally arise since the system parameters must be aggregated into equivalent time constants and coefficients, representing the dynamics at the area level [7]- [10]. Bus dynamics are also state-dependent uncertainties according to the…”
Section: This Leads To the Lfc Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper bound structure in (9) is statedependent. In multi-area LFC, state-dependent uncertainties naturally arise since the system parameters must be aggregated into equivalent time constants and coefficients, representing the dynamics at the area level [7]- [10]. Bus dynamics are also state-dependent uncertainties according to the…”
Section: This Leads To the Lfc Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are small [6], [7]. In multi-area LFC, uncertainties naturally arise since the system parameters must be aggregated into equivalent time constants and coefficients, representing the dynamics at the area level [7]- [10]. The aggregation of dynamics creates the need to handle both parametric uncertainties and unmodelled dynamics, which are challenging for fixed-gain control [11]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26], in order to decrease frequency detection error and communication delay, a hybrid control approach was developed as a combination of centralized and distributed control methods used to control the flexible loads. By considering the load disturbances and uncertainties in system parameters, [27] proposed active disturbance rejection control to increase the frequency robustness and designed an adaptive delay compensator to decrease the impact of communication delays on the frequency stability for single-area LFC system with DR control loop. Recently, authors in [28] extended their earlier work reported in [25] in order to develop a mathematical model for sensitivity and stability analysis of the system frequency response with respect to important parameters associated with DR and virtual control loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in [24], stability delay margins were obtained by trial and error simulation method rather than using an exact method. In [26,27], various compensation schemes were proposed to decrease the frequency deviation in the presence of time-delays in the DR control loop. In those studies, authors did not present any qualitative/quantitative analysis to determine the impact of the DR controls with time-delays on the delay-dependent stability of LFC-DR systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the wind power and demand side load are all uncertain, sometimes the total produced power is less than the demand loads required. In this situation, the demand side response (DSR), which can control or shift the controllable loads, has become a promising smart grid technology for accommodating intermittent renewable generations (Zhu et al, 2014;Esther and Kumar, 2016;Zhu et al, 2016a;Hosseini et al, 2020). In recent years, the PEVs have drawn increasing attention to the transportation electrification and suppressed the fluctuation in renewable energy sources have been investigated in lots of literature (Kariminejad et al, 2018;Nunna et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%