2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.05.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay-dependent state feedback stabilization for a networked control model with two additive input delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system with time delays commonly includes one single delay. However, for some real world systems such as networked control systems [26], [27], the delays may be induced from the different channels. For example, as in Figure 1, there can be two separate delays: one is from sensor to controller, and the other is from controller to actuator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system with time delays commonly includes one single delay. However, for some real world systems such as networked control systems [26], [27], the delays may be induced from the different channels. For example, as in Figure 1, there can be two separate delays: one is from sensor to controller, and the other is from controller to actuator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30], [31], to improve conservatism of the stability condition, the relationship between the timevarying delay and its upper bound was further considered in the process of estimating the derivative of LKF. Besides, many researchers have tried to achieve a MUBTD guaranteeing asymptotic stability [26], [32], [33], [34], [35]. More recently, the authors of [36] tried to take into account more information of system with ATDs by introducing an improved delay interconnection integral terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the distribution characteristic of delays mentioned above has been modeled firstly as a system with two additive time-varying delay components in [4], many significant results have been devoted to this issue. As a most general form, linear systems with two additive delay components have drawn lots of attention [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Moreover, neural networks [16][17][18][19][20][21], T-S fuzzy systems [22,23], and Lur'e systems [24], considering two additive delay components in the state, have been also investigated recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some criteria with less conservatism are obtained in [8] by taking the delay, its upper bound, and the relationship between them into account. A novel LKF [9] is constructed, for which positive definiteness is ensured by the whole LKF rather than each term. In [10], a delay-partitioningbased LKF was established, which greatly reduces the conservatism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, stability analysis of time-delay systems is classified into two categories such as delay-independent and delay-dependent stability criterion in which the later one uses the information of maximal delay bound and the former one does not. Delay-dependent case has the advantage of using information on the maximal size of the delay bound [10][11][12], and hence, it yields less conservative result over the delay-independent case [13]. For the recent progress of time-delay system, the reader may refer to [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and the reference therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%